• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筛查与否,当临床指南存在分歧时:基层医疗医生对前列腺特异性抗原检测的应用

To screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: primary care physicians' use of the PSA test.

作者信息

Purvis Cooper Crystale, Merritt Tracie L, Ross Louie E, John Lisa V, Jorgensen Cynthia M

机构信息

National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, MS K-55, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2004 Feb;38(2):182-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.035.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.035
PMID:14715210
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines for using the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test as a population-based screening tool vary considerably. This study qualitatively explored primary care physicians' PSA screening practices and their understanding of the PSA screening controversy.

METHODS

Fourteen telephone focus groups were conducted with 75 primary care physicians practicing in 35 US states. Data were coded around three major topics: PSA screening practices, factors influencing these practices, and familiarity with clinical guidelines.

RESULTS

Two practice patterns emerged. Most participants recommended regular PSA screening beginning around age 50 for asymptomatic men with no known risk factors and at least a 10-year life expectancy. These "routine screeners" attributed their approach to experience that supported the benefit of PSA screening and to patient demand for the test. Other physicians discussed the implications of PSA screening with patients before offering the test, but neither recommended for or against it. The approach of these "nonroutine screeners" was primarily guided by the lack of scientific evidence documenting the benefit of PSA screening.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed practice patterns reflect both sides of the PSA screening controversy. While routine and nonroutine screeners differ in their approach, both reported high rates of PSA screening.

摘要

背景

将前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测用作基于人群的筛查工具的临床指南差异很大。本研究定性地探讨了初级保健医生的PSA筛查实践及其对PSA筛查争议的理解。

方法

对在美国35个州执业的75名初级保健医生进行了14次电话焦点小组访谈。围绕三个主要主题对数据进行编码:PSA筛查实践、影响这些实践的因素以及对临床指南的熟悉程度。

结果

出现了两种实践模式。大多数参与者建议,对于无已知风险因素且预期寿命至少还有10年的无症状男性,从50岁左右开始定期进行PSA筛查。这些“常规筛查者”将他们的做法归因于支持PSA筛查益处的经验以及患者对该检测的需求。其他医生在提供检测之前会与患者讨论PSA筛查的影响,但既不推荐也不反对。这些“非常规筛查者”的做法主要是由于缺乏记录PSA筛查益处的科学证据。

结论

观察到的实践模式反映了PSA筛查争议的双方。虽然常规筛查者和非常规筛查者的方法不同,但两者报告的PSA筛查率都很高。

相似文献

1
To screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: primary care physicians' use of the PSA test.筛查与否,当临床指南存在分歧时:基层医疗医生对前列腺特异性抗原检测的应用
Prev Med. 2004 Feb;38(2):182-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.035.
2
Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.大型综合医疗系统中的前列腺癌筛查实践:2007 - 2014年
BJU Int. 2017 Aug;120(2):257-264. doi: 10.1111/bju.13793. Epub 2017 Feb 26.
3
Effect of guidelines on primary care physician use of PSA screening: results from the Community Tracking Study Physician Survey.指南对基层医疗医生进行前列腺特异性抗原筛查的影响:社区追踪研究医生调查结果
Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):681-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08315243. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
4
Formative evaluation of the prostate cancer screening practices of African-American physicians.非裔美国医生前列腺癌筛查实践的形成性评估。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Oct;98(10):1637-43.
5
Prostate-specific antigen screening: An update of physician beliefs and practices.前列腺特异性抗原筛查:医生观念和实践的更新。
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103:66-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 6.
6
Prostate-specific antigen testing among the elderly in community-based family medicine practices.社区家庭医疗实践中老年人的前列腺特异性抗原检测
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 May-Jun;22(3):257-65. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.03.080136.
7
Primary Care Physicians Beliefs about Prostate-Specific Antigen Evidence Uncertainty, Screening Efficacy, and Test Use.初级保健医生对前列腺特异性抗原证据不确定性、筛查效果和检测使用的看法。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Oct;110(5):491-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 May 7.
8
Factors influencing primary care physicians' decision to order prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test for men without prostate cancer.影响初级保健医生决定为无前列腺癌男性开具前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的因素。
Acta Oncol. 2013 Nov;52(8):1602-8. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.762998. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
9
Primary care physicians' reported use of pre-screening discussions for prostate cancer screening: a cross-sectional survey.基层医疗医生报告的前列腺癌筛查前筛查讨论的使用情况:一项横断面调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Mar 18;10:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-19.
10
The PSA testing dilemma: GPs' reports of consultations with asymptomatic men: a qualitative study.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的困境:全科医生关于与无症状男性会诊的报告:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Jun 25;8:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-35.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating the uncertainty of precision cancer screening: The role of shared decision-making.应对精准癌症筛查的不确定性:共同决策的作用。
PEC Innov. 2023 Jan 24;2:100127. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100127. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Strategies used in managing conversations about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing among family physicians (FPs): a qualitative study.家庭医生在管理前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测相关对话时所采用的策略:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 28;13(4):e073415. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073415.
3
A Supervised Learning Tool for Prostate Cancer Foci Detection and Aggressiveness Identification using Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging.
一种使用多参数磁共振成像/磁共振波谱成像的用于前列腺癌病灶检测和侵袭性识别的监督学习工具。
Cancer Inform. 2018 Jul 10;17:1176935118786260. doi: 10.1177/1176935118786260. eCollection 2018.
4
Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Initiation and Shared Decision-Making: Findings from the 2000 and 2015 National Health Interview Surveys.前列腺特异性抗原检测的启动和共享决策:来自 2000 年和 2015 年国家健康访谈调查的发现。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;31(4):658-662. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.170448.
5
Primary goals, information-giving and men's understanding: a qualitative study of Australian and UK doctors' varied communication about PSA screening.主要目标、信息提供与男性的理解:对澳大利亚和英国医生关于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查的不同沟通方式的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e018009. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018009.
6
Clinician Factors Associated With Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in Older Veterans With Limited Life Expectancy.预期寿命有限的老年退伍军人中与前列腺特异性抗原筛查相关的临床医生因素
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 May 1;176(5):654-61. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0695.
7
Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey.男性是否获得了关于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测共同决策所需的信息?一项全国性调查的结果。
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0870-8.
8
Knowledge and attitude of the population toward cancer prostate Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得地区民众对前列腺癌的认知与态度
Urol Ann. 2015 Apr-Jun;7(2):154-8. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.150516.
9
Doctors' approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study.基层医疗中医生对前列腺特异性抗原检测及过度诊断的处理方式:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 17;5(3):e006367. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006367.
10
A comparison of inpatient glucose management guidelines: implications for patient safety and quality.住院患者血糖管理指南比较:对患者安全和质量的影响
Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Mar;15(3):13. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0583-8.