Suppr超能文献

初级保健医生对前列腺特异性抗原证据不确定性、筛查效果和检测使用的看法。

Primary Care Physicians Beliefs about Prostate-Specific Antigen Evidence Uncertainty, Screening Efficacy, and Test Use.

机构信息

Department of Leadership Studies, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC, USA.

Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Oct;110(5):491-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 May 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Little is known about primary care physicians' (PCPs) beliefs about prostate cancer screening efficacy, evidence uncertainty, and their actual screening behaviors. We examined factors associated with PCP beliefs about screening efficacy and uncertainty and whether beliefs were associated with prostate specific-antigen (PSA) test use.

METHODS

The 2008 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Practices Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening collected information on physicians' attitudes, beliefs, and practices related to prostate cancer and screening (n=1,256). Two factors were constructed that measured belief in certainty of evidence for PSA testing and belief in screening efficacy. These factors, along with PCP sociodemographic and practice-related factors, were used to examine associations with offering the PSA test.

RESULTS

Most PCPs were male (70%), Caucasian (76%), under age 50 (56%), and practiced in communities with more than 50,000 residents (54%). In bivariate analysis, variables associated with PCP belief in evidence uncertainty included female gender, younger age, and lower patient volume. Variables associated with belief in screening efficacy included older age and general and family practice specialty. After adjustment, PCPs with high belief in evidence uncertainty were less likely (OR=0.19, 95% CI=0.06, 0.62) to offer PSA and more likely to practice shared decision making (OR=1.80, 95% CI=1.22-2.67). PCPs with high belief in screening efficacy were more likely (OR=2.99, 95% CI=1.15, 7.77) to offer PSA and less likely to practice shared decision making (OR=0.47, 95% CI=0.32-0.70).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that belief patterns about evidence uncertainty and the efficacy of using PSA may play a role in whether PCPs offer PSA.

摘要

背景/目的:对于初级保健医生(PCP)对前列腺癌筛查效果、证据不确定性的信念以及他们实际的筛查行为,我们知之甚少。我们研究了与 PCP 对筛查效果和不确定性的信念相关的因素,以及这些信念是否与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的使用相关。

方法

2008 年全国初级保健医生前列腺癌筛查实践调查收集了与前列腺癌和筛查相关的医生态度、信念和实践的信息(n=1256)。构建了两个衡量 PSA 检测证据确定性信念和筛查效果信念的因素。这些因素,以及 PCP 的社会人口统计学和与实践相关的因素,被用于研究与提供 PSA 检测的关联。

结果

大多数 PCP 为男性(70%)、白种人(76%)、年龄在 50 岁以下(56%),在居民超过 50000 人的社区行医(54%)。在单变量分析中,与 PCP 对证据不确定性的信念相关的变量包括女性性别、较年轻的年龄和较低的患者量。与筛查效果信念相关的变量包括年龄较大、普通科和家庭科专业。调整后,对证据不确定性有高度信念的 PCP 提供 PSA 的可能性较低(OR=0.19,95%CI=0.06,0.62),更有可能进行共同决策(OR=1.80,95%CI=1.22-2.67)。对 PSA 筛查效果有高度信念的 PCP 更有可能提供 PSA(OR=2.99,95%CI=1.15,7.77),而更不可能进行共同决策(OR=0.47,95%CI=0.32-0.70)。

结论

我们的数据表明,对证据不确定性和使用 PSA 的效果的信念模式可能在 PCP 是否提供 PSA 方面发挥作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验