Suppr超能文献

[骨密度测量技术]

[Bone mineral density measurement techniques].

作者信息

Ibáñez R

机构信息

Sección de Reumatología, Hospital de Navarra, Pamplona, 31008, Spain.

出版信息

An Sist Sanit Navar. 2003;26 Suppl 3:19-27.

Abstract

Different techniques for measuring bone mass density developed in the last years are revised. Single and dual fotonic absorciometry are now outdated by the use of single and dual x-ray absorciometry which don't need an isotope source. The most widely used technique now is the dual energy x-ray asbsorciometry, specially the ones who analyse lumbar spine and hip. It is an accurate and precise tool and has proved to be a good predictor of fractures. Nevertherless, peripheral densitometers based on dual energy x-ray or on broadband ultrasonic attenuation, have also proved to be of utility. Quantitative computed tomography is the only three-dimensional densitometer available, capable to selectively measure cortical or trabecular bone. It has the inconvenient of the high radiation and cost. We argue about advantages and disadvantages of the different techniques of bone mass measurements.Lastly, we revise the indications of densitometry. There are not unanimous criteria about this question, but different organisms and scientific societies have elaborated recommendations based on risk factors of osteoporosis and fracture, that could be of utility in clinical practice.

摘要

对近年来开发的不同骨密度测量技术进行了综述。单光子吸收法和双光子吸收法现在已被单能X线吸收法和双能X线吸收法所取代,后者不需要同位素源。目前使用最广泛的技术是双能X线吸收法,特别是用于分析腰椎和髋部的方法。它是一种准确且精确的工具,已被证明是骨折的良好预测指标。然而,基于双能X线或宽带超声衰减的外周骨密度仪也已证明具有实用性。定量计算机断层扫描是唯一可用的三维骨密度仪,能够选择性地测量皮质骨或小梁骨。它有辐射高和成本高的缺点。我们讨论了不同骨量测量技术的优缺点。最后,我们回顾了骨密度测量的适应症。关于这个问题没有一致的标准,但不同的机构和科学协会已根据骨质疏松症和骨折的风险因素制定了建议,这些建议在临床实践中可能有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验