Evans Kimberley, Reddan Donal N, Szczech Lynda Anne
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA.
Semin Dial. 2004 Jan-Feb;17(1):22-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139x.2004.17110.x.
Congestive heart failure (CHF) and hyperkalemia are the two leading reasons for emergency dialysis among individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). While hemodialysis provides definitive treatment of both hyperkalemia and volume overload among ESRD patients, for those who present outside of "regular dialysis hours," institution of dialysis may be delayed. Nondialytic management can be instituted immediately and should be the initial therapy in the management of hyperkalemia and CHF in these individuals. Current available evidence does not allow conclusions as to whether treatment with nondialytic strategies alone results in different outcomes than nondialytic strategies coupled with emergent hemodialysis. Therefore, whether or not nondialytic management alone is appropriate remains a matter of individual judgment that should be decided on a case-by-case basis.
充血性心力衰竭(CHF)和高钾血症是终末期肾病(ESRD)患者紧急透析的两大主要原因。虽然血液透析能为ESRD患者的高钾血症和容量超负荷提供确定性治疗,但对于那些在“常规透析时间”之外就诊的患者,透析治疗可能会延迟。非透析治疗可立即开展,且应作为这些患者高钾血症和CHF管理的初始治疗方法。目前可得的证据无法得出单独采用非透析策略治疗与非透析策略联合紧急血液透析治疗是否会产生不同结果的结论。因此,单独进行非透析治疗是否合适仍是一个需根据具体情况逐一判断的个人决策问题。