Suppr超能文献

在适当情况下,谁没有接受颈动脉内膜切除术?

Who doesn't receive carotid endarterectomy when appropriate?

作者信息

Horner Ronnie D, Oddone Eugene Z, Stechuchak Karen M, Johnston Dean C C, Grambow Steven C

机构信息

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/NIH, Neuroscience Center Building, Room 2149, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 10852, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jan;39(1):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.08.004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and nonclinical factors associated with failure to perform carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with clinically appropriate indications. We analyzed data from a prospective cohort study performed at five Veterans Affairs medical centers. Patients were referred for carotid artery evaluation if they had at least 50% stenosis in one carotid artery, had no history of CEA, and were independently classified preoperatively as appropriate candidates for CEA, according to clinical criteria. The primary outcome was receipt of CEA within 6 months of evaluation. Data were collected by medical record review and interview regarding clinical status, and patient and physician perception of the risks and benefits of CEA.

RESULTS

Among clinically appropriate candidates for CEA, 66.8% (n = 233) did not undergo the operation. Compared with patients who did undergo CEA, a greater proportion of these patients had no symptoms (68.7% vs 45.7%; P <.001). A twofold greater proportion of patients who did not undergo CEA were in the highest quartile of reported aversion to surgery. Moreover, a fourfold greater proportion were perceived by their physicians to be at less than 5% risk for future stroke without the operation, and more than a twofold greater proportion were believed to experience less than 5% efficacy from the operation by their providers (P <.01). In multivariable analyses, four characteristics were significantly associated with whether an appropriate candidate did not receive CEA: asymptomatic disease, less than 70% stenosis, high expressed aversion to surgery score, and low (<5%) provider-perceived efficacy of the operation.

CONCLUSION

Among patients in the Veterans Affairs health care system who are clinically appropriate candidates for CEA, those who did not receive the operation were less likely to have symptomatic disease or high-grade carotid artery stenosis, but were more likely to report high aversion to surgery and to have a provider who believed CEA would not be efficacious.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在具有临床适当指征的患者中,与未能进行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)相关的临床和非临床因素。我们分析了在五个退伍军人事务医疗中心进行的一项前瞻性队列研究的数据。如果患者一侧颈动脉狭窄至少50%,且无CEA病史,并且根据临床标准在术前被独立分类为CEA的合适候选者,则被转诊进行颈动脉评估。主要结局是在评估后6个月内接受CEA。通过病历审查和关于临床状况以及患者和医生对CEA风险和益处的认知的访谈来收集数据。

结果

在CEA的临床合适候选者中,66.8%(n = 233)未接受手术。与接受CEA的患者相比,这些患者中无症状的比例更高(68.7%对45.7%;P <.001)。未接受CEA的患者中,报告对手术厌恶程度处于最高四分位数的比例是接受手术患者的两倍。此外,医生认为未接受手术的患者未来发生中风的风险低于5%的比例是接受手术患者的四倍,而医生认为手术疗效低于5%的比例是接受手术患者的两倍多(P <.01)。在多变量分析中,有四个特征与合适的候选者是否未接受CEA显著相关:无症状疾病、狭窄程度小于70%、对手术的高表达厌恶评分以及医生认为手术疗效低(<5%)。

结论

在退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中临床适合进行CEA的患者中,未接受手术的患者患症状性疾病或严重颈动脉狭窄的可能性较小,但更有可能报告对手术的高度厌恶,并且其医生认为CEA无效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验