Miller F W, Leitman S F, Cronin M E, Hicks J E, Leff R L, Wesley R, Fraser D D, Dalakas M, Plotz P H
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892.
N Engl J Med. 1992 May 21;326(21):1380-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199205213262102.
The therapeutic options for patients with polymyositis or dermatomyositis that is resistant to corticosteroids are limited, unproved, and often toxic. Uncontrolled trials concluded that both plasma exchange and leukapheresis are beneficial, but despite the considerable use of these approaches, proof of their efficacy is lacking.
Thirty-nine patients with definite polymyositis or dermatomyositis were randomly assigned to receive plasma exchange (replacement of one volume of plasma with 5 percent albumin in saline), leukapheresis (removal of 5 x 10(9) to 10 x 10(9) lymphocytes), or sham apheresis in a double-blind manner, with 12 treatments given over a one-month period. Muscle strength, functional capacity, and serum levels of muscle-associated enzymes were measured before and after the 12 procedures.
In each group 3 of 13 patients had improvements in strength and functional capacity. The condition of 3 patients treated with leukapheresis and 1 treated with plasma exchange deteriorated, and it was unchanged in the other 26 patients. Adverse effects of apheresis included the need for a central venous catheter (9 patients), major vasovagal episodes (3 patients), and severe citrate reactions (2 patients). Despite the occurrence of significant reductions in the serum levels of muscle enzymes with plasma exchange (P less than 0.001) and significant decreases in lymphocyte counts with leukapheresis (P = 0.002), there were no significant differences among the three treatment groups in the final muscle strength or functional capacity of the patients.
As treatments for corticosteroid-resistant polymyositis or dermatomyositis, leukapheresis and plasma exchange are no more effective than sham apheresis.
对于对皮质类固醇耐药的多发性肌炎或皮肌炎患者,治疗选择有限、未经证实且往往具有毒性。非对照试验得出结论,血浆置换和白细胞去除术均有益,但尽管这些方法被大量使用,其疗效仍缺乏证据。
39例确诊为多发性肌炎或皮肌炎的患者被随机分配接受血浆置换(用5%白蛋白盐水替代1个血浆容量)、白细胞去除术(去除5×10⁹至10×10⁹个淋巴细胞)或假单采术,采用双盲方式,在1个月内进行12次治疗。在12次治疗前后测量肌肉力量、功能能力以及肌肉相关酶的血清水平。
每组13例患者中有3例肌肉力量和功能能力得到改善。接受白细胞去除术治疗的3例患者和接受血浆置换治疗的1例患者病情恶化,其他26例患者病情未变。单采术的不良反应包括需要中心静脉导管(9例患者)、严重血管迷走神经反应(3例患者)和严重枸橼酸盐反应(2例患者)。尽管血浆置换使肌肉酶血清水平显著降低(P<0.001),白细胞去除术使淋巴细胞计数显著减少(P = 0.002),但在患者的最终肌肉力量或功能能力方面,三个治疗组之间没有显著差异。
作为皮质类固醇耐药的多发性肌炎或皮肌炎的治疗方法,白细胞去除术和血浆置换并不比假单采术更有效。