Deeprose C, Andrade J, Varma S, Edwards N
Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TP, UK.
Br J Anaesth. 2004 Feb;92(2):171-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh054.
Learning during anaesthesia has been demonstrated, but little is known about the circumstances under which it may occur. This study investigated the hypothesis that learning during anaesthesia occurs during, but not before, surgical stimulation.
Words were played through headphones to 64 day-surgery patients during propofol anaesthesia. Fourteen words were played repeatedly (15 times) for 1 min each either before (n=32) or during (n=32) surgical stimulation. The depth of anaesthesia was estimated using the bispectral index (BIS). Heart rate, ventilatory frequency, mean arterial pressure, end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration, and infusion rate of propofol were recorded at 1 min intervals during word presentation. On recovery, memory was assessed using an auditory word stem completion test and word recognition test.
The mean BIS, arterial pressure, end-tidal carbon dioxide and heart rate during word presentation did not differ between the groups. The infusion rate of propofol and the ventilatory frequency were significantly greater in the during-surgical stimulation group. There was no evidence for explicit recall or recognition, nor of awareness during anaesthesia (median mean-BIS=38 in the before-surgical stimulation group and 42 in the during-surgical stimulation group). Only patients who were played words during surgical stimulation showed significant implicit memory on recovery (mean score=0.08, P<0.02) However, their scores were not significantly higher than those of the before-surgical stimulation group (mean score=0.01).
Learning during anaesthesia seems more likely to occur during rather than before surgical stimulation at comparable anaesthetic depth. We hypothesize that surgical stimulation facilitates learning during anaesthesia, independently of its effects on anaesthetic depth.
麻醉期间的学习现象已得到证实,但对于其可能发生的情况却知之甚少。本研究调查了以下假设:麻醉期间的学习发生在手术刺激期间,而非手术刺激之前。
在丙泊酚麻醉期间,通过耳机向64名日间手术患者播放单词。14个单词在手术刺激前(n = 32)或手术刺激期间(n = 32)重复播放(15次),每次播放1分钟。使用脑电双频指数(BIS)评估麻醉深度。在播放单词期间,每隔1分钟记录心率、呼吸频率、平均动脉压、呼气末二氧化碳浓度和丙泊酚输注速率。在患者恢复后,使用听觉单词词干补全测试和单词识别测试评估记忆。
两组在单词播放期间的平均BIS、动脉压、呼气末二氧化碳和心率无差异。手术刺激期间组的丙泊酚输注速率和呼吸频率显著更高。没有证据表明存在明确的回忆或识别,也没有麻醉期间知晓的证据(手术刺激前组的BIS中位数为38,手术刺激期间组为42)。只有在手术刺激期间播放单词的患者在恢复时有显著的内隐记忆(平均得分 = 0.08,P < 0.02)。然而,他们的得分并不显著高于手术刺激前组(平均得分 = 0.01)。
在可比的麻醉深度下,麻醉期间的学习似乎更有可能发生在手术刺激期间而非之前。我们假设手术刺激促进了麻醉期间的学习,这与其对麻醉深度的影响无关。