• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究伦理基础:负责任的研究行为。

Research ethics 101: the responsible conduct of research.

作者信息

Ingham Janis Costello

机构信息

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA. jcinghamspeech.ucsb.edu

出版信息

Semin Speech Lang. 2003 Nov;24(4):323-37. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-815585.

DOI:10.1055/s-2004-815585
PMID:14722805
Abstract

The ethical, responsible conduct of research (RCR) is fundamental to the quality of science in our discipline, and ultimately to the advancement of knowledge. Therefore, appreciation of the basic concepts of RCR is vital to all segments of the discipline, from students to clinicians to scientists themselves. Conversely, fraud in science, or research misconduct, is diametrically opposed to the quality of science and the advancement of knowledge. This article overviews the major concepts associated with RCR as well as the kinds of behaviors that would be identified as research misconduct. Case study examples are provided for contemplation and discussion.

摘要

符合伦理道德、负责任的研究行为(RCR)是我们学科科学质量的基础,最终也是知识进步的基础。因此,理解RCR的基本概念对该学科的所有领域都至关重要,从学生到临床医生再到科学家自身。相反,科学欺诈或研究不当行为与科学质量和知识进步截然相反。本文概述了与RCR相关的主要概念以及将被认定为研究不当行为的各类行为。文中提供了案例研究示例以供思考和讨论。

相似文献

1
Research ethics 101: the responsible conduct of research.研究伦理基础:负责任的研究行为。
Semin Speech Lang. 2003 Nov;24(4):323-37. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-815585.
2
The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.科学研究的伦理:对科学家和机构代表焦点小组的分析
J Investig Med. 1997 Aug;45(6):371-80.
3
[Integrity in science: a constant concern].[科学中的诚信:始终关注的问题]
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2004;66(5-6):321-33.
4
Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics.科学伦理教育第二部分:医学研究人员在参加短期科学伦理课程后对科研欺诈态度的转变
J BUON. 2012 Apr-Jun;17(2):391-5.
5
Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?研究伦理与黄禹锡事件的教训:我们能从韩国克隆造假事件中学到什么?
J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):214-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023721.
6
Scientific societies and promotion of the responsible conduct of research: codes, policies, and education.科学协会与促进负责任的研究行为:规范、政策与教育
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):865-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7e58.
7
Your mission is ... academic fraud and theft are a growing problem as researchers struggle to keep to an ethical code that is never talked about. Now some of science's top names are taking up the fight to keep the profession honest.你的任务是……学术欺诈和剽窃是一个日益严重的问题,因为研究人员努力遵守一项从未被提及的道德准则。现在,一些科学界的知名人士正在奋起抗争,以维护该行业的诚信。
New Sci. 1999 Jul 3;162(2193):38-41.
8
Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research.应对科研行为责任教育中的挑战。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):870-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f77fe.
9
Scientific integrity in nursing research.
J Neurosci Nurs. 1993 Oct;25(5):321-5.
10
Research integrity and publication ethics.研究诚信与出版伦理。
Atherosclerosis. 2010 Oct;212(2):383-5. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.01.050. Epub 2010 Feb 18.