Neumayer Eric
Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, WC2A 2AE, London, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Mar;58(6):1037-47. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00276-4.
In his article with the provocative title "Are Recessions Good for Your Health?", Ruhm (J. Health Econ. 21(4) (2000) 659) has found robust and consistent evidence that the total mortality rate, age-specific mortality rates as well as most specific mortality causes are pro-cyclical. His finding that high unemployment rates are associated with lower mortality and vice versa stands in stark contrast to Brenner's earlier work, who found the opposite effect, possibly after a time lag. Ruhm controls for state-specific effects in a panel of US states over the period 1972-1991, whereas Brenner's work is based on time-series analysis. Extending and improving upon Ruhm's original analysis, we analyse the effect of state unemployment and economic growth rates on mortality in the states of Germany over the period 1980-2000, both in a static and a dynamic econometric model. Controlling for state-specific effects, we find evidence that aggregate mortality rates for all age groups taken together as well as most specific age groups are lower in recessions. The same is true for mortality from cardiovascular diseases, pneumonia and influenza, motor vehicle accidents and suicides, but not for necessarily for other specific mortality causes. In particular, there is never a statistically significant effect on homicides, other external effects and malignant neoplasms. There are also few differences apparent between the effect on male and female mortality. If we do not control for state-specific effects, then we often arrive at the opposite result with higher unemployment being associated with higher mortality. This suggests that a failure to control for time-invariant state-specific effects leads to omitted variable bias, which would erroneously suggest that mortality rates move counter-cyclically. Overall, we can confirm Ruhm's main finding for another country: recessions lower some, but not all, mortality rates in the case of Germany.
在鲁姆发表的题为《经济衰退对你的健康有益吗?》这一颇具争议性的文章中(《健康经济学杂志》,2000年第21卷第4期,第659页),他发现了有力且一致的证据,表明总死亡率、特定年龄死亡率以及大多数特定死因与经济周期呈顺周期性。他的研究结果显示,高失业率与较低死亡率相关,反之亦然,这与布伦纳早期的研究形成了鲜明对比,布伦纳发现的是相反的效应,可能存在一定的时间滞后。鲁姆在1972 - 1991年期间对美国各州的面板数据中控制了州特定效应,而布伦纳的研究基于时间序列分析。在扩展和改进鲁姆原始分析的基础上,我们在静态和动态计量经济模型中,分析了1980 - 2000年期间德国各州的州失业率和经济增长率对死亡率的影响。在控制州特定效应的情况下,我们发现证据表明,所有年龄组的总死亡率以及大多数特定年龄组在经济衰退期间较低。心血管疾病、肺炎和流感、机动车事故以及自杀导致的死亡率也是如此,但其他特定死因不一定如此。特别是,对凶杀案、其他外部因素和恶性肿瘤的影响从未有统计学上的显著意义。对男性和女性死亡率的影响之间也几乎没有明显差异。如果我们不控制州特定效应,那么我们往往会得出相反的结果,即较高的失业率与较高的死亡率相关。这表明,未能控制时间不变的州特定效应会导致遗漏变量偏差,这会错误地表明死亡率呈逆周期性变动。总体而言,我们可以证实鲁姆针对另一个国家的主要发现:在德国,经济衰退会降低部分而非全部死亡率。