• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺动脉导管置换导丝技术的安全性。

Safety of a guidewire technique for replacement of pulmonary artery catheters.

作者信息

Bach A, Böhrer H, Geiss H K

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1992 Dec;6(6):711-4. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(92)90057-e.

DOI:10.1016/1053-0770(92)90057-e
PMID:1472669
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if a guidewire change from a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) to a central venous catheter (CVC) poses a significant infection risk. A total of 128 consecutive cardiac surgical patients with PACs inserted in the operating room were entered into this study. Postoperatively, patients were randomly allocated to receive a double-lumen CVC, either at the initial introducer insertion site over a guidewire, or at a new site with de novo catheterization. The tips of all introducers, PACs, and CVCs were cut off, cultured, and semi-quantitatively analyzed. The results show that insertion of CVCs over a guidewire within 48 hours after initial venapuncture is no more likely to be associated with catheter colonization than is de novo percutaneous insertion at a different site. From 48 hours up to 72 hours following initial insertion of the PAC, an incidence of catheter-related infection of 35.3% was observed in the guidewire group, as opposed to 12.5% in the de novo group. It is recommended that the use of a guidewire technique for catheter replacement (PAC to CVC) is a safe alternative to de novo insertion of a CVC within 48 hours after initial insertion of the PAC. In order to minimize the potential risk of catheter-related infection and bacteremia in cardiac surgical patients, de novo catheterization beyond 48 hours after initial venapuncture is suggested.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定从肺动脉导管(PAC)更换为中心静脉导管(CVC)时导丝的更换是否会带来显著的感染风险。共有128例在手术室插入PAC的连续心脏手术患者纳入本研究。术后,患者被随机分配接受双腔CVC,要么通过导丝在初始穿刺部位插入,要么在新部位重新进行导管插入。所有穿刺针、PAC和CVC的尖端均被剪下,进行培养和半定量分析。结果显示,在初次静脉穿刺后48小时内通过导丝插入CVC与在不同部位重新经皮插入相比,导管定植的可能性并无差异。在PAC初次插入后48小时至72小时期间,导丝组导管相关感染的发生率为35.3%,而重新插入组为12.5%。建议在PAC初次插入后48小时内,使用导丝技术更换导管(从PAC更换为CVC)是重新插入CVC的安全替代方法。为了将心脏手术患者导管相关感染和菌血症的潜在风险降至最低,建议在初次静脉穿刺48小时后进行重新导管插入。

相似文献

1
Safety of a guidewire technique for replacement of pulmonary artery catheters.肺动脉导管置换导丝技术的安全性。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1992 Dec;6(6):711-4. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(92)90057-e.
2
Evaluation of strategies for central venous catheter replacement.
Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):797-804. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199206000-00017.
3
Infectious and mechanical complications of central venous catheters placed by percutaneous venipuncture and over guidewires.经皮静脉穿刺和经导丝置入中心静脉导管的感染性和机械性并发症。
Crit Care Med. 1992 Oct;20(10):1426-30. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199210000-00011.
4
The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters: a prospective study utilizing molecular subtyping.肺动脉漂浮导管相关感染的发病机制与流行病学:一项利用分子分型的前瞻性研究
Am J Med. 1991 Sep 16;91(3B):197S-205S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90369-9.
5
Mechanisms and risk factors for infection of pulmonary artery catheters and introducer sheaths in cancer patients admitted to an intensive care unit.
J Hosp Infect. 2001 Aug;48(4):289-97. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1014.
6
Central venous catheter replacement in the ICU: new site versus guidewire exchange.重症监护病房中心静脉导管的更换:新部位与导丝交换法
Minerva Anestesiol. 2007 May;73(5):267-73. Epub 2006 Dec 12.
7
A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management.一项关于纱布和两种聚氨酯敷料用于肺动脉导管置管部位护理的前瞻性随机试验:对导管管理的启示
Crit Care Med. 1994 Nov;22(11):1729-37.
8
Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature.中心静脉导管更换策略:文献系统综述
Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;25(8):1417-24. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199708000-00033.
9
Scheduled replacement of central venous catheters is not necessary.无需定期更换中心静脉导管。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000 Jun;21(6):371-4. doi: 10.1086/501775.
10
Decreasing catheter-related infection and hospital costs by continuous quality improvement.
Crit Care Med. 1996 Oct;24(10):1660-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199610000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Reassessing the need for scheduled replacement of short term central venous catheters: A narrative comprehensive review.重新评估短期中心静脉导管定期更换的必要性:一项叙述性综合综述。
Infect Prev Pract. 2024 Nov 7;6(4):100420. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100420. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care.用于重症监护成年患者的肺动脉导管。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD003408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003408.pub3.
3
Central venous catheter infections: concepts and controversies.
中心静脉导管感染:概念与争议
Intensive Care Med. 1995 Feb;21(2):177-83. doi: 10.1007/BF01726542.