McNaught Allan
Health Development Department, School of Health and Social Care, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2003 Oct-Dec;18(4):313-28. doi: 10.1002/hpm.733.
Health policy and its implementation in small island developing states (SIDS) is a neglected area of study, and, seemingly, of little interest. The existing literature is generally characterized by descriptions of failure or incompetence, with little attempt to understand the nature and workings of the policy process in these small, yet complex, societies. The research undertaken in this article was carried out over 6 years in Anguilla (pop. 9000) and the British Virgin Islands (pop. 20 000), two British Overseas Territories in the North East Caribbean. The purpose of the research was to determine to what extent policy theory and the tools of policy analysis could be used to explain the nature and the outcomes of the health policy and implementation process. In trying to analyse and understand the policy process in these small islands it was necessary to understand their socio-politic character. In addition, the development of a model of the public policy and public administration system in the English-speaking Caribbean was an essential part of this process. It was found that the conduct and outcome of the policy and implementation process in these islands varied significantly. It is postulated that the variations are anchored in the nature of the local context, the working practices and ideologies of politicians, senior public servants and the local policy elite.
卫生政策及其在小岛屿发展中国家(SIDS)的实施是一个被忽视的研究领域,而且似乎也没什么人感兴趣。现有文献通常以对失败或无能的描述为特征,几乎没有尝试去理解这些小而复杂的社会中政策过程的本质和运作方式。本文所开展的研究在安圭拉岛(人口9000)和英属维尔京群岛(人口20000)进行了6年,这两个地区是加勒比海东北部的英国海外领土。该研究的目的是确定政策理论和政策分析工具在多大程度上可用于解释卫生政策及实施过程的本质和结果。在试图分析和理解这些小岛屿的政策过程时,有必要了解它们的社会政治特征。此外,构建一个加勒比英语地区公共政策和公共行政系统的模型是这一过程的重要组成部分。研究发现,这些岛屿上政策及实施过程的行为和结果差异显著。据推测,这些差异源于当地环境的性质、政治家、高级公务员和当地政策精英的工作方式及意识形态。