• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗经前烦躁障碍患者的管理式医疗费用比较。

Comparison of managed care charges among patients treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for premenstrual dysphoric disorder.

作者信息

Endicott Jean, McLaughlin Trent P, Grudzinski Amy N

机构信息

New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;64(12):1511-6. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n1216.

DOI:10.4088/jcp.v64n1216
PMID:14728114
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact on managed care charges of selecting citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, or sertraline as first-line pharmacotherapy for newly diagnosed premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD).

METHOD

This retrospective study analyzed administrative claims data from 14 managed care plans in the United States. The study population was identified from an integrated outcomes database for the period Jan. 1, 1998, to Dec. 31, 1999. Patients aged 18 years or older, newly diagnosed with PMDD, and initiating therapy with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) within 30 days of the diagnosis were eligible for analysis. To date, there is no specific ICD-9 diagnosis code for PMDD; thus, patients were required to have an ICD-9 diagnosis of premenstrual tension syndrome (ICD-9 625.4). Patients with documented previous psychiatric disorders/treatment were excluded. All inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy claims incurred by each patient during the study period were included in the analysis. PMDD-related treatment charges for the 6-month period following treatment initiation were compared using multivariate regression.

RESULTS

A total of 1413 patients met the study criteria. Fluoxetine and sertraline were the most common agents selected as first-line therapy. After differences in age, managed care plan, pretreatment resource utilization, physician specialty, index prescription year, treatment charges, presence of mental health and nonmental health comorbid conditions, and changes in medication were controlled for, patients taking paroxetine and citalopram had significantly higher PMDD-related treatment charges than sertraline patients (paroxetine, p =.0430; citalopram, p =.0226). Fluoxetine patients also had higher treatment charges than sertraline patients, though statistical significance was not reached.

CONCLUSIONS

Sertraline, as first-line therapy for PMDD, was associated with lower PMDD-related treatment charges compared with other SSRIs during the first 6 months after treatment initiation.

摘要

目的

确定选择西酞普兰、氟西汀、帕罗西汀或舍曲林作为新诊断的经前烦躁障碍(PMDD)的一线药物治疗对管理式医疗费用的影响。

方法

这项回顾性研究分析了来自美国14个管理式医疗计划的行政索赔数据。研究人群从1998年1月1日至1999年12月31日的综合结果数据库中确定。年龄在18岁及以上、新诊断为PMDD且在诊断后30天内开始使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗的患者符合分析条件。迄今为止,尚无PMDD的特定ICD-9诊断代码;因此,患者必须有经前紧张综合征的ICD-9诊断(ICD-9 625.4)。有既往精神疾病/治疗记录的患者被排除。分析包括每位患者在研究期间产生的所有住院、门诊和药房索赔。使用多变量回归比较治疗开始后6个月期间与PMDD相关的治疗费用。

结果

共有1413名患者符合研究标准。氟西汀和舍曲林是最常被选为一线治疗的药物。在控制了年龄、管理式医疗计划、治疗前资源利用、医生专业、索引处方年份、治疗费用、心理健康和非心理健康合并症的存在以及药物变化的差异后,服用帕罗西汀和西酞普兰的患者与PMDD相关的治疗费用显著高于服用舍曲林的患者(帕罗西汀,p = 0.0430;西酞普兰,p = 0.0226)。氟西汀患者的治疗费用也高于舍曲林患者,尽管未达到统计学显著性。

结论

与其他SSRI相比,舍曲林作为PMDD的一线治疗药物,在治疗开始后的前6个月与较低的PMDD相关治疗费用相关。

相似文献

1
Comparison of managed care charges among patients treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for premenstrual dysphoric disorder.使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗经前烦躁障碍患者的管理式医疗费用比较。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;64(12):1511-6. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n1216.
2
A claims analysis comparing citalopram with sertraline as initial pharmacotherapy for a new episode of depression: impact on depression-related treatment charges.一项将西酞普兰与舍曲林作为抑郁症新发作的初始药物治疗进行比较的索赔分析:对抑郁症相关治疗费用的影响。
Clin Ther. 2004 Jan;26(1):115-24. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90012-4.
3
Pharmacy and medical costs associated with switching between venlafaxine and SSRI antidepressant therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder.文拉法辛与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)抗抑郁治疗药物相互转换治疗重度抑郁症的药学及医疗成本。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Jun;14(5):426-41. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.5.426.
4
[Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD): Drug and psychotherapeutique management, a literature review].[经前烦躁障碍(PMDD):药物与心理治疗管理,文献综述]
Encephale. 2024 Apr;50(2):211-232. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for premenstrual dysphoric disorder.经前期烦躁障碍治疗的成本效果分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(2):129-40. doi: 10.2165/11532210-000000000-00000.
6
Economic evaluation of major selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors in a managed care population.在管理式医疗人群中对主要选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的经济学评估。
Manag Care Interface. 2001 Apr;14(4):59-65.
7
Course and cost of treatment for depression with fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline.氟西汀、帕罗西汀和舍曲林治疗抑郁症的疗程及费用
Am J Manag Care. 1999 May;5(5):597-606.
8
Treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder with luteal phase dosing of sertraline.黄体期服用舍曲林治疗经前烦躁障碍
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003 Nov;4(11):2065-78. doi: 10.1517/14656566.4.11.2065.
9
Evaluating the economic consequences of early antidepressant treatment discontinuation: a comparison between controlled-release and immediate-release paroxetine.评估早期停用抗抑郁药治疗的经济后果:控释帕罗西汀与速释帕罗西汀的比较。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Oct;24(5):544-8. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000140999.45053.07.
10
Relationship of total health care charges to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor utilization patterns including the length of antidepressant therapy--results from a managed care administrative claims database.总体医疗费用与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂使用模式(包括抗抑郁治疗时长)的关系——来自一个管理式医疗行政索赔数据库的结果
J Manag Care Pharm. 2005 Mar;11(2):145-50. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2005.11.2.145.