Rogóz Zofia, Skuza Grazyna, Wójcikowski Jacek, Daniel Włakysława A
Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Smetna 12, PL 31-343 Kraków, Poland.
Pol J Pharmacol. 2003 Nov-Dec;55(6):993-9.
In the present study, we examined the effects of imipramine (IMI) and metyrapone (MET) given alone or in combination of IMI and MET in the forced swimming test in rats. We also measured pharmacokinetic parameters: the level of IMI and its metabolite, desipramine (DMI), in the rat plasma and brain (1 h after the forced swimming test). The present studies indicate that MET (50 mg/kg) reduced immobility time. Combined treatment with MET (50 mg/kg) and IMI (5 or 10 mg/kg) produced stronger antidepressant-like effect than either of drugs given alone. Sulpiride (dopamine D2/3 antagonist), or WAY 100635 (5-HT1A antagonist) but not prazosin, (alpha1-adrenergic antagonist), at doses ineffective in the forced swimming test, inhibited an antidepressant-like effect induced by co-administration of IMI with MET. The active behaviors in that test did not reflect an increase in general activity, since combined administration of IMI and MET failed to alter the locomotor activity of rats, measured in the open field test. MET elevated the concentrations of IMI and DMI in plasma, and the total drug concentration (IMI + DMI) was doubled by MET. In the brain, MET enhanced the concentration of IMI, but decreased that of DMI, consequently, the brain IMI/DMI ratio increased twice. The total drug concentration in the brain (IMI + DMI) was not changed significantly by MET treatment. The obtained results suggest that dopamine D2/3 and 5-HT1A receptors may contribute to the mechanism of synergistic action of IMI and MET in the forced swimming test in rats, and that pharmacokinetic interaction should not have a substantial impact on the MET-induced potentiation of IMI effect, observed in vivo. These findings may be of particular importance to pharmacotherapy of drug-resistant depression.
在本研究中,我们检测了单独给予丙咪嗪(IMI)和甲吡酮(MET),以及联合给予IMI和MET对大鼠强迫游泳试验的影响。我们还测量了药代动力学参数:在强迫游泳试验1小时后,大鼠血浆和脑中IMI及其代谢产物去甲丙咪嗪(DMI)的水平。目前的研究表明,MET(50mg/kg)可减少不动时间。MET(50mg/kg)与IMI(5或10mg/kg)联合治疗产生的抗抑郁样效应比单独给予任何一种药物都更强。舒必利(多巴胺D2/3拮抗剂)或WAY 100635(5-HT1A拮抗剂),但不是哌唑嗪(α1-肾上腺素能拮抗剂),在强迫游泳试验中无效的剂量下,可抑制IMI与MET联合给药诱导的抗抑郁样效应。该试验中的主动行为并不反映总体活动的增加,因为IMI和MET联合给药未能改变在旷场试验中测量的大鼠运动活动。MET提高了血浆中IMI和DMI的浓度,并且MET使总药物浓度(IMI+DMI)增加了一倍。在脑中,MET提高了IMI的浓度,但降低了DMI的浓度,因此,脑内IMI/DMI比值增加了两倍。MET治疗后脑中总药物浓度(IMI+DMI)没有显著变化。获得的结果表明,多巴胺D2/3和5-HT1A受体可能参与了IMI和MET在大鼠强迫游泳试验中的协同作用机制,并且药代动力学相互作用对体内观察到的MET诱导的IMI效应增强不应有实质性影响。这些发现可能对耐药性抑郁症的药物治疗特别重要。