Pellacani Giovanni, Grana Costantino, Cucchiara Rita, Seidenari Stefania
Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emila, Modena, Italy.
Dermatology. 2004;208(1):21-6. doi: 10.1159/000075041.
Identification of dark areas inside a melanocytic lesion (ML) is of great importance for melanoma diagnosis, both during clinical examination and employing programs for automated image analysis.
The aim of our study was to compare two different methods for the automated identification and description of dark areas in epiluminescence microscopy images of MLs and to evaluate their diagnostic capability.
Two methods for the automated extraction of 'absolute' (ADAs) and 'relative' dark areas (RDAs) and a set of parameters for their description were developed and tested on 339 images of MLs acquired by means of a polarized-light videomicroscope.
Significant differences in dark area distribution between melanomas and nevi were observed employing both methods, permitting a good discrimination of MLs (diagnostic accuracy = 74.6 and 71.2% for ADAs and RDAs, respectively).
Both methods for the automated identification of dark areas are useful for melanoma diagnosis and can be implemented in programs for image analysis.
在临床检查以及采用自动图像分析程序时,识别黑素细胞性病变(ML)内的暗区对于黑色素瘤诊断至关重要。
我们研究的目的是比较两种不同方法,用于自动识别和描述ML的表皮透光显微镜图像中的暗区,并评估它们的诊断能力。
开发了两种用于自动提取“绝对”(ADAs)和“相对”暗区(RDAs)的方法以及一组用于描述它们的参数,并在通过偏光视频显微镜获取的339张ML图像上进行了测试。
使用这两种方法均观察到黑色素瘤和痣之间暗区分布存在显著差异,从而能够很好地区分ML(ADAs和RDAs的诊断准确率分别为74.6%和71.2%)。
两种自动识别暗区的方法均对黑色素瘤诊断有用,并且可以在图像分析程序中实现。