Hankey Graeme J
Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17 Suppl 3:11-6. doi: 10.1159/000075299.
Among high vascular risk patients, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) reduces the relative risk of serious vascular events by about one fifth. However, because ASA fails to prevent four fifths of serious vascular events, more effective, yet equally safe and affordable, antiplatelet regimens are desired. Compared with ASA, clopidogrel alone reduces the odds of serious vascular events by about 10%, and the combination of dipyridamole and ASA reduces the odds of serious vascular events by about 6%. Combining ASA with an orally administered platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blocker is not effective, and indeed more hazardous than ASA alone. Among patients with non-ST-segment acute coronary syndromes (ACS), the addition of an intravenously administered GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist to ASA reduces the risk of vascular events by about 10% compared with ASA, and the addition of clopidogrel to ASA reduces the risk of vascular events by 20% compared with ASA alone. Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), both the addition of an intravenously administered GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist to ASA, and the addition of clopidogrel to ASA reduce the risk of vascular events by 30% compared with ASA alone. The greater efficacy of the combinations of ASA with clopidogrel, and ASA with an intravenously administered GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, in patients with ACS and those undergoing PCI has fostered several ongoing and planned trials of these regimens in the acute and long-term management of patients with ischaemic brain syndromes. The combination of ASA and clopidogrel is being compared with ASA alone within 12 h of onset of symptoms of TIA in two trials (FASTER, ATARI), and the use of an intravenously administered GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist is being compared with placebo within 6 h of onset of acute ischaemic stroke in two trials (AbESST, AbESST-2). Six trials are assessing the combination of clopidogrel and ASA in the long-term management of patients with ischaemic brain syndromes due to atherothrombosis (MATCH, CHARISMA, ARCH, CARESS, SPS3) or atrial fibrillation (ACTIVE). The MATCH trial of clopidogrel and ASA versus clopidogrel alone in patients with recent TIA or ischaemic stroke is the first which is likely to report its results - in mid 2004. The combination of dipyridamole and ASA is being compared with ASA in the ESPRIT trial and with the combination of clopidogrel and ASA in the planned PRoFESS trial. These ongoing and planned clinical trials of antiplatelet therapy promise to further define the role of combination antiplatelet therapy in the acute and long-term management of patients with ischaemic brain syndromes.
在高血管风险患者中,乙酰水杨酸(ASA)可将严重血管事件的相对风险降低约五分之一。然而,由于ASA无法预防五分之四的严重血管事件,因此人们期望有更有效、同样安全且价格合理的抗血小板治疗方案。与ASA相比,单独使用氯吡格雷可将严重血管事件的几率降低约10%,双嘧达莫与ASA联合使用可将严重血管事件的几率降低约6%。将ASA与口服血小板糖蛋白(GP)IIb/IIIa阻滞剂联合使用无效,而且实际上比单独使用ASA更危险。在非ST段急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,与ASA相比,在ASA基础上加用静脉注射的GP IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂可将血管事件风险降低约10%,在ASA基础上加用氯吡格雷与单独使用ASA相比可将血管事件风险降低20%。在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者中,与单独使用ASA相比,在ASA基础上加用静脉注射的GP IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂以及在ASA基础上加用氯吡格雷均可将血管事件风险降低30%。ASA与氯吡格雷联合使用以及ASA与静脉注射的GP IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂联合使用在ACS患者和接受PCI的患者中具有更高的疗效,这促使人们针对这些治疗方案在缺血性脑综合征患者的急性和长期管理中开展了多项正在进行和计划中的试验。在两项试验(FASTER、ATARI)中,将ASA与氯吡格雷联合使用与在短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)症状出现后12小时内单独使用ASA进行比较;在两项试验(AbESST、AbESST - 2)中,将在急性缺血性卒中发作后6小时内使用静脉注射的GP IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂与安慰剂进行比较。六项试验正在评估氯吡格雷与ASA联合使用在动脉粥样硬化血栓形成(MATCH、CHARISMA、ARCH、CARESS、SPS3)或心房颤动(ACTIVE)所致缺血性脑综合征患者长期管理中的效果。氯吡格雷与ASA联合使用对比单独使用氯吡格雷治疗近期TIA或缺血性卒中患者的MATCH试验可能是首个公布结果的试验——将于2004年年中公布。在ESPRIT试验中,将双嘧达莫与ASA联合使用与单独使用ASA进行比较,并在计划中的PRoFESS试验中将其与氯吡格雷与ASA联合使用进行比较。这些正在进行和计划中的抗血小板治疗临床试验有望进一步明确联合抗血小板治疗在缺血性脑综合征患者急性和长期管理中的作用。