Miwa Zenzo, Baba Kazuyoshi, Inada Yuzuru, Miyamoto Tomoyuki, Wadachi Reiko, Arai Naoya, Uzawa Narikazu, Nishimura Harumi, Tukino Sanae, Ochiumi Makie, Umino Masahiro
Department of Orofacial Development and Function, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2003 Dec;70(4):234-41. doi: 10.5357/koubyou.70.234.
In 2002, the Dental Hospital of Tokyo Medical and Dental University set up a working group for risk management. This working group analyzed 225 incident and accident reports submitted to the hospital in 2001 and 2002. Each report was analyzed with regard to "type," "place," "reporter," "severity," and "cause" in order to diagnose hospital safety and prevent future incidents and accidents. The cause of incidents and accidents was analyzed using the SHEL model, where S stands for Software, H for Hardware, E for Environment, and L for Liveware. The severity of the consequence was classified into 6 levels, where level 0 = "error not applied," level 1 = "not affected," level 2 = "watch and see or additional test," level 3 = "treatment," level 4 = "aftereffect," and level 5 = "death." The incidents and accidents judged to have potentially high risk were given a score of "+H," irrespective of the level. The results of the analyses revealed that most of the incidents and accidents happened in "wards," "operation rooms," and "oral surgery clinics." This is probably because the incident and accident reporting system is well established by nurses working in these clinics. Additional analysis revealed that most of the reports were written and submitted by nurses. The frequencies of "treatment procedure," "misuse of dental instruments," "mis-prescription," "falling down" and "needlestick" related incidents and accidents were the highest and were caused mainly by L and S. There were only 3 accidents above level 4, however, less severe cases were given a score of +H due to the high potential risk involved.
2002年,东京医科齿科大学牙科医院成立了风险管理工作组。该工作组分析了2001年和2002年提交至医院的225份事件及事故报告。每份报告都从“类型”“地点”“报告人”“严重程度”和“原因”等方面进行分析,以诊断医院安全状况并预防未来的事件及事故。事件及事故的原因采用SHEL模型进行分析,其中S代表软件,H代表硬件,E代表环境,L代表人员。后果的严重程度分为6个级别,0级 = “未发生错误”,1级 = “未受影响”,2级 = “观察或额外检查”,3级 = “治疗”,4级 = “后遗症”,5级 = “死亡”。被判定具有潜在高风险的事件及事故,无论级别如何,都给予“+H”评分。分析结果显示,大多数事件及事故发生在“病房”“手术室”和“口腔外科诊所”。这可能是因为这些诊所的护士建立了完善的事件及事故报告系统。进一步分析发现,大多数报告是由护士撰写并提交的。“治疗过程”“牙科器械使用不当”“处方错误”“摔倒”和“针刺”相关的事件及事故发生频率最高,主要由人员和软件因素导致。然而,4级以上的事故仅有3起,不过由于涉及的潜在风险较高,不太严重的病例也被给予了+H评分。