• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对用于增强重度或极重度智力障碍者能力的多感官环境刺激设备的分析。

An analysis of Snoezelen equipment to reinforce persons with severe or profound mental retardation.

作者信息

Matson Johnny L, Bamburg Jay W, Smalls Yemonja

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2004 Jan-Feb;25(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2003.10.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2003.10.001
PMID:14733978
Abstract

Systematically developing methods of reinforcement for persons with severe and profound mental retardation has only recently received a good deal of attention. This topic is important since professionals in the field often have difficulty identifying sufficient numbers of positive stimuli. Snoezelen equipment as reinforcement for individuals with severe and profound mental retardation was evaluated because of the promise it holds for this population. Types of Snoezelen equipment which were most often approached and most reinforcing for these persons were identified. Implications of the findings for future assessment and treatment are discussed.

摘要

系统地开发针对重度和极重度智力障碍者的强化方法,直到最近才受到广泛关注。这个话题很重要,因为该领域的专业人员在确定足够数量的积极刺激方面常常遇到困难。由于Snoezelen设备对这一人群具有潜在价值,因此对其作为重度和极重度智力障碍者的强化手段进行了评估。确定了这些人最常接触且最具强化作用的Snoezelen设备类型。并讨论了研究结果对未来评估和治疗的启示。

相似文献

1
An analysis of Snoezelen equipment to reinforce persons with severe or profound mental retardation.对用于增强重度或极重度智力障碍者能力的多感官环境刺激设备的分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2004 Jan-Feb;25(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2003.10.001.
2
The development of a reinforcer choice assessment scale for persons with severe and profound mental retardation.重度和极重度智力障碍者强化物选择评估量表的编制
Res Dev Disabil. 1999 Sep-Oct;20(5):379-84. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(99)00018-9.
3
Current limits to reinforcer identification for some persons with profound multiple disabilities.当前针对一些重度多重残疾人士强化物识别的限制因素。
Res Dev Disabil. 1996 Jan-Feb;17(1):77-92. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(95)00038-0.
4
Effects of living room, Snoezelen room, and outdoor activities on stereotypic behavior and engagement by adults with profound mental retardation.客厅、多感官刺激室及户外活动对重度智力障碍成年人刻板行为和参与度的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2001 May-Jun;22(3):183-204. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(01)00067-1.
5
Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.强化物选择对发育障碍个体任务反应的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):411-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-411.
6
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
7
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.使用选择评估来预测强化物的有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):1-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-1.
8
Acquisition and functional use of voice output communication by persons with profound multiple disabilities.重度多重残疾人士对语音输出通讯的获取与功能使用。
Behav Modif. 1996 Oct;20(4):451-68. doi: 10.1177/01454455960204005.
9
Multi-sensory rooms: comparing effects of the Snoezelen and the Stimulus Preference environment on the behavior of adults with profound mental retardation.多感官室:比较 snoezelen 和刺激偏好环境对重度智力迟钝成年人行为的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1):160-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
10
A comparison of behavioral techniques to teach functional independent-living skills to individuals with severe and profound mental retardation.将行为技术用于教导重度和极重度智力障碍者功能性独立生活技能的比较。
Behav Modif. 1998 Jul;22(3):298-306. doi: 10.1177/01454455980223005.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensory approaches for adults with severe or profound and multiple learning disabilities: A systematic literature review.针对重度、极重度及多重学习障碍成年人的感官方法:一项系统文献综述。
Br J Occup Ther. 2024 Mar;87(3):129-142. doi: 10.1177/03080226231208717. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
2
Patterns of equipment use for autistic children in multi-sensory environments: Time spent with sensory equipment varies by sensory profile and intellectual ability.多感官环境中自闭症儿童的设备使用模式:与感官设备相处的时间因感官特征和智力水平而异。
Autism. 2024 Mar;28(3):644-655. doi: 10.1177/13623613231180266. Epub 2023 Jul 7.