• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

证据质量:在衡量医疗保健质量方面的有用性。

Quality of evidence: usefulness in measuring the quality of health care.

作者信息

Swan Beth Ann, Boruch Robert F

机构信息

Office of International Programs & PAHO/WHO Collaborating Center for Nursing and Midwifery Leadership, and the Family and Community Health Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2004 Feb;42(2 Suppl):II12-20. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000109123.10875.5c.

DOI:10.1097/01.mlr.0000109123.10875.5c
PMID:14734938
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 1998, the Committee on Health Care Quality in America was created and given the charge of devising a strategy to achieve substantial improvement in the quality of health care for all Americans. One strategy to move the quality agenda forward is the use of evidence by both providers of health care and consumers of health care. One feature of this agenda, evidence-based practice, refers to a hierarchy of evidence ranging from individual randomized, controlled trials to expert opinion.

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this article are to describe the evidence base in nursing, discuss the quality and strength of nursing's evidence, illustrate the application of the Quality Health Outcomes Model, and present recommendations for practice, research, and policy to increase nursing's contribution to quality health care.

RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Nurses everywhere must use innovative solutions to operationalize the "evidence" in evidence-based nursing. The Quality Health Outcomes Model (QHOM) provides a useful way of advancing research and evidence about the quality of health care in America. In concert with the conceptual framework for the National Health Care Quality Report, the QHOM provides a map for identifying evidence gaps and research questions arising from the model and conceptual framework, as well as evidence synthesis (integrating methodologic quality) driven by theoretical understanding.

摘要

背景

1998年,美国医疗保健质量委员会成立,并负责制定一项战略,以大幅提高所有美国人的医疗保健质量。推动质量议程向前发展的一项战略是医疗保健提供者和消费者都使用证据。该议程的一个特点,即循证实践,指的是从个体随机对照试验到专家意见的一系列证据等级。

目标

本文的目的是描述护理领域的证据基础,讨论护理证据的质量和强度,说明质量健康结果模型的应用,并提出关于实践、研究和政策的建议,以增加护理对优质医疗保健的贡献。

结果与建议

各地护士必须采用创新解决方案,将循证护理中的“证据”付诸实践。质量健康结果模型(QHOM)为推进有关美国医疗保健质量的研究和证据提供了一种有用的方式。与《国家医疗保健质量报告》的概念框架相一致,QHOM提供了一张地图,用于识别该模型和概念框架中产生的证据差距和研究问题,以及由理论理解驱动的证据综合(整合方法学质量)。

相似文献

1
Quality of evidence: usefulness in measuring the quality of health care.证据质量:在衡量医疗保健质量方面的有用性。
Med Care. 2004 Feb;42(2 Suppl):II12-20. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000109123.10875.5c.
2
Framing the problem of measuring and improving healthcare quality: has the Quality Health Outcomes Model been useful?构建衡量和改善医疗质量的问题:质量健康结果模型有用吗?
Med Care. 2004 Feb;42(2 Suppl):II4-11. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000109122.92479.fe.
3
Outcomes and effectiveness research: capacity building for nurse researchers at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.结果与效果研究:医疗保健研究与质量局护士研究人员的能力建设
Outcomes Manag. 2002 Oct-Dec;6(4):146-51.
4
Core drivers of quality: a remote health example from Australia.质量的核心驱动因素:来自澳大利亚的一个远程医疗案例
Rural Remote Health. 2007 Jul-Sep;7(3):611. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
5
Comparing two nursing outcomes reporting initiatives.比较两项护理结果报告倡议。
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract. 2000 Jul-Sep;4(3):144-9.
6
The current state of nursing performance measurement, public reporting, and value-based purchasing.护理绩效评估、公开报告及基于价值的采购的现状
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2008 Aug;9(3):181-91. doi: 10.1177/1527154408323042.
7
Nursing process outcome linkage research: issues, current status, and health policy implications.护理程序结果关联研究:问题、现状及对卫生政策的影响
Med Care. 2004 Feb;42(2 Suppl):II40-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000109291.44014.cb.
8
A transparency and accountability framework for high-value inpatient nursing care.
Nurs Econ. 2010 Sep-Oct;28(5):295-306.
9
Using clinical models to frame outcomes evaluation: the Arizona Nurses' Association Nursing Report Card Project.运用临床模型构建结果评估:亚利桑那护士协会护理报告卡项目
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract. 2000 Jan-Mar;4(1):13-8.
10
Evaluation of a model of nursing care for older patients using participatory action research in an acute medical ward.在急性内科病房中运用参与式行动研究对老年患者护理模式进行评估。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):588-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01371.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of a tool to assess patient satisfaction, waiting times, healthcare utilization, and cost.一种用于评估患者满意度、等待时间、医疗保健利用率和成本的工具的验证。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Jun 11;20:e47. doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000094.
2
Self-perceived evidence-based practice competencies: a survey of faculty and students at a chiropractic institution.自我认知的循证实践能力:对一所脊椎按摩疗法机构的教师和学生的调查。
J Chiropr Educ. 2021 Mar 1;35(1):22-27. doi: 10.7899/JCE-18-24.
3
'PICO-D Management'; a decision-aid for evidence-based chiropractic education and clinical practice.
“PICO-D管理”:基于证据的整脊疗法教育与临床实践的决策辅助工具。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2016 Dec 12;24:49. doi: 10.1186/s12998-016-0130-y. eCollection 2016.
4
Development and psychometric evaluation of an evidence-based practice questionnaire for a chiropractic curriculum.脊椎按摩疗法课程循证实践问卷的编制与心理测量学评估
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Nov-Dec;35(9):692-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.10.011.