Suppr超能文献

CA125反应标准是否高估了上皮性卵巢癌二线治疗中的肿瘤反应?

Do CA125 response criteria overestimate tumour response in second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma?

作者信息

Gronlund B, Hansen H H, Høgdall C, Høgdall E V S, Engelholm S A

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 9 Blegdamsvej, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2004 Jan 26;90(2):377-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601501.

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that cancer antigen 125 (CA125) response criteria tend to overestimate a tumour reduction measured by standard WHO response criteria in recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The aim of the study was to validate the recently introduced GCIG (The Gynaecological Cancer Intergroup) CA125 response criteria in predicting a tumour response measured by WHO (World Health Organization) criteria. Changes in CA125 levels (GCIG criteria) were retrospectively compared with alterations in the tumour load (WHO criteria) during second-line chemotherapy with topotecan or paclitaxel-platinum in 124 consecutive patients with recurrent or refractory disease. In patients assessable by both response criteria (n=72), the overall response rate using GCIG CA125 criteria was 57% (95% confidence interval (CI): 45-69%) and significantly higher than the response rate of 39% (95% CI: 28-51%) using WHO response criteria (P=0.045). The GCIG CA125 criteria had a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI: 82-100%), a specificity of 68% (95% CI: 52-81%) and an accuracy of 79% (95% CI: 68-88%) in predicting a response measured by WHO criteria. In conclusion, the GCIG CA125 response criteria seem to overestimate a tumour response by WHO criteria when monitoring the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy with topotecan or paclitaxel-platinum in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

摘要

近期研究表明,在复发性上皮性卵巢癌中,癌抗原125(CA125)反应标准往往会高估按照世界卫生组织(WHO)标准测量的肿瘤缩小情况。本研究的目的是验证最近引入的妇科癌症 Intergroup(GCIG)CA125反应标准在预测按照WHO(世界卫生组织)标准测量的肿瘤反应方面的有效性。对124例连续性复发或难治性疾病患者在接受拓扑替康或紫杉醇 - 铂类二线化疗期间,将CA125水平的变化(GCIG标准)与肿瘤负荷的变化(WHO标准)进行回顾性比较。在两种反应标准均可评估的患者(n = 72)中,使用GCIG CA125标准的总体反应率为57%(95%置信区间(CI):(45 - 69%),显著高于使用WHO反应标准的39%(95% CI:28 - 51%)的反应率(P = 0.045)。GCIG CA125标准在预测按照WHO标准测量的反应时,敏感性为96%(95% CI:82 - 100%),特异性为68%(95% CI:52 - 81%),准确性为79%(95% CI:68 - 88%)。总之,在监测上皮性卵巢癌患者使用拓扑替康或紫杉醇 - 铂类进行二线化疗的疗效时,GCIG CA125反应标准似乎高估了按照WHO标准测量的肿瘤反应。

相似文献

5
CA125 Nadir values as a prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer.CA125最低值作为上皮性卵巢癌的一个预后因素
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 1;23(10):2435-6; author reply 2436. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.136.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验