Ascher-Svanum Haya, Kennedy John S, Lee David, Haberman Merle
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Ind 46285, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Jan;10(1):20-4.
To examine the use and economic cost of antiparkinsonian agents during the medication management of patients diagnosed with schizophrenic disorders in a naturalistic healthcare setting.
Cross-sectional retrospective analysis of 1-year (1999) administrative data from a large managed care organization.
Patients were 1938 adults who were treated for a schizophrenic disorder. Monthly per patient utilization rate and cost of antiparkinsonian agents, and the proportion of the total psychiatric medication costs attributed to the antiparkinsonian agents, were compared across antipsychotic medications (typical, atypical, olanzapine, risperidone), age, sex, and diagnostic subtype.
About one third (39%) of the patients were treated with typical antipsychotics only, and half of them (51%) received antiparkinsonian agents. Those treated with atypical antipsychotics only (41%) were considerably less likely to receive antiparkinsonian agents (25%), and the rate of use differed by atypical type such that risperidone-treated patients were more likely to receive antiparkinsonian agents than those treated with olanzapine. Lower utilization rates of antiparkinsonian agents were also found among patients age 75 years or older, and among those diagnosed with a schizoaffective disorder. Average monthly per patient cost of antiparkinsonian agents was 3.0 dollars, constituting 2.6% of the monthly expenditure on all psychiatric medications.
Adjunctive use of antiparkinsonian agents differs widely among patients who are treated with typical or atypical antipsychotic drugs, and differs between types of atypical antipsychotics. The choice of atypical antipsychotics that have a lower liability for extrapyramidal symptoms may assist in optimizing the long-term functional outcomes of schizophrenia patients.
在自然主义的医疗环境中,研究被诊断为精神分裂症的患者在药物管理期间抗帕金森药物的使用情况及经济成本。
对一家大型管理式医疗组织1999年的1年行政数据进行横断面回顾性分析。
患者为1938名接受精神分裂症治疗的成年人。比较了抗精神病药物(典型、非典型、奥氮平、利培酮)、年龄、性别和诊断亚型之间每位患者每月抗帕金森药物的使用率、成本以及抗帕金森药物在精神科药物总费用中所占的比例。
约三分之一(39%)的患者仅接受典型抗精神病药物治疗,其中一半(51%)接受了抗帕金森药物治疗。仅接受非典型抗精神病药物治疗的患者(41%)接受抗帕金森药物治疗的可能性要小得多(25%),且使用率因非典型药物类型而异,接受利培酮治疗的患者比接受奥氮平治疗的患者更有可能接受抗帕金森药物治疗。在75岁及以上的患者以及被诊断为精神分裂症的患者中,抗帕金森药物的使用率也较低。每位患者每月抗帕金森药物的平均成本为3.0美元,占所有精神科药物每月支出的2.6%。
在接受典型或非典型抗精神病药物治疗的患者中,抗帕金森药物的辅助使用差异很大,且不同类型非典型抗精神病药物之间也存在差异。选择锥体外系症状发生率较低的非典型抗精神病药物可能有助于优化精神分裂症患者的长期功能预后。