Hebert V R, Miller G C
Washington State University, 2710 University Drive, Richland, Washington 99352, USA.
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2004;181:1-36. doi: 10.1007/0-387-21733-9_1.
Many field monitoring studies have indicated the substantial role of the troposphere as both a sink and transport medium for pesticides. At the same time, this is the least studied and understood environmental compartment in regards to pesticide fate. Although the fundamental principles behind volatilization and tropospheric reactivity are well understood, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the ability to quantitatively measure flux and reaction rates in the air will continue to pose problems for researchers. To date, most deterministic models that try to simulate real world conditions generally fail to provide tropospherically relevant flux and reaction rates because it is virtually impossible to scale down all possible interactions occurring in a near-infinite reservoir. Better field methods for determining flux are emerging and more ambient air monitoring studies are being conducted. This growing database of information, together with an understanding of physicochemical properties and use of expert systems, has increased the predictive capability for estimating volatilization flux of pesticides. Unfortunately, there are very limited environmental data on the tropospheric reaction rates of pesticides, and more experimental studies using semivolatile to low-volatility pesticides or their more volatile homologues are required to validate existing structure-activity relationship (SAR) model predictions. The development of new analytical strategies using elevated temperatures for assessing semivolatile to low-volatility pesticide reaction rates and products may provide an alternative approach to the need for controlled environmental temperature data. Recent international workshops organized by the Health Council of The Netherlands for developing uniform approaches for assessing exposure risks to pesticides in air exemplify efforts to synchronize flux with environmental fate information for determining human health and ecological risks. When more detailed pesticide information is desired, especially in high-use agricultural areas, where exposure to humans and nontarget ecological communities is a major concern, field flux measurements and downwind monitoring, together with experimental fate studies, should be considered. The integration of models, empirical testing, and real world monitoring will provide the ultimate safety net needed for assessing exposure risks to airborne pesticides.
许多现场监测研究表明,对流层作为农药的汇和传输介质发挥着重要作用。与此同时,就农药归宿而言,这是研究最少且了解最少的环境部分。尽管挥发和对流层反应性背后的基本原理已为人熟知,但越来越明显的是,对研究人员来说,定量测量空气中的通量和反应速率仍将是个难题。迄今为止,大多数试图模拟现实世界状况的确定性模型通常无法提供与对流层相关的通量和反应速率,因为要缩减在近乎无限的储库中发生的所有可能相互作用几乎是不可能的。用于确定通量的更好的现场方法正在出现,并且正在开展更多的环境空气监测研究。这个不断增长的信息数据库,加上对物理化学性质的了解以及专家系统的使用,提高了估算农药挥发通量的预测能力。不幸的是,关于农药对流层反应速率的环境数据非常有限,需要更多使用半挥发性至低挥发性农药或其挥发性更强的同系物的实验研究来验证现有的构效关系(SAR)模型预测。利用高温评估半挥发性至低挥发性农药反应速率和产物的新分析策略的发展,可能为获取受控环境温度数据的需求提供一种替代方法。荷兰卫生理事会最近组织的国际研讨会,旨在制定评估空气中农药暴露风险的统一方法,这体现了将通量与环境归宿信息同步以确定人类健康和生态风险的努力。当需要更详细的农药信息时,特别是在高农药使用的农业地区,那里人类和非目标生态群落的暴露是主要关注点,应考虑进行现场通量测量和下风向监测,以及实验性归宿研究。模型、实证测试和现实世界监测的整合将为评估空气中农药的暴露风险提供所需的最终安全保障。