Eisler Ronald
U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, 11510 American Holly Drive, Laurel, MD 20708-4019, USA.
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2004;181:139-98. doi: 10.1007/0-387-21733-9_4.
Mercury contamination of the environment from historical and ongoing mining practices that rely on mercury amalgamation for gold extraction is widespread. Contamination was particularly severe in the immediate vicinity of gold extraction and refining operations; however, mercury, especially in the form of water-soluble methylmercury, may be transported to pristine areas by rainwater, water currents, deforestation, volatilization, and other vectors. Examples of gold mining-associated mercury pollution have been shown for Canada, the U.S., Africa, China, the Philippines, Siberia, and South America. In parts of Brazil, for example, mercury concentrations in all abiotic materials, plants, and animals, including endangered species of mammals and reptiles, collected near ongoing mercury amalgamation gold mining sites were far in excess of allowable mercury levels promulgated by regulatory agencies for the protection of human health and natural resources. Although health authorities in Brazil are unable to detect conclusive evidence of human mercury intoxication, the potential exists in the absence of mitigation for epidemic mercury poisoning of the mining population and environs. In the U.S., environmental mercury contamination is mostly from historical gold mining practices, and portions of Nevada remain sufficiently mercury contaminated to pose a hazard to reproduction of carnivorous fishes and fish-eating birds. Concentrations of total mercury lethal to sensitive representative natural resources range from 0.1 to 2.0 microg/L of medium for aquatic organisms; from 2,200 to 31,000 microg/kg BW (acute oral) and from 4,000 to 40,000 microg/kg (dietary) for birds; and from 100 to 500 microg/kg BW (daily dose) and from 1,000 to 5,000 microg/kg diet for mammals. Significant adverse sublethal effects were observed among selected aquatic species at water concentrations of 0.03-0.1 microg Hg/L. For some birds, adverse effects, mainly on reproduction, have been associated with total mercury concentrations (microg/kg FW) of 5,000 in feathers, 900 in eggs, and 50-100 in diet, and with daily intakes of 640 microg/kg BW. Sensitive nonhuman mammals showed significant adverse effects of mercury when daily intakes were 250 microg/kg BW, when dietary levels were 1,100 microg/kg, or when tissue concentrations exceeded 1,100 microg/kg. Proposed mercury criteria for protection of aquatic life range from 0.012 microg/L for freshwater life to 0.025 microg/L for marine life; for birds, less than 100 microg/kg diet FW; and for small mammals, less than 1,100 microg/kg FW diet. All these proposed criteria provide, at best, minimal protection.
历史上以及当前依赖汞齐化法提取黄金的采矿作业对环境造成的汞污染十分普遍。在黄金开采和精炼作业的紧邻区域,污染尤为严重;然而,汞,特别是水溶性甲基汞的形式,可能会通过雨水、水流、森林砍伐、挥发及其他媒介被输送到原始地区。加拿大、美国、非洲、中国、菲律宾、西伯利亚和南美洲都有与金矿开采相关的汞污染实例。例如,在巴西部分地区,在正在进行汞齐化法金矿开采作业附近采集的所有非生物物质、植物和动物,包括濒危的哺乳动物和爬行动物种,其汞浓度远远超过监管机构为保护人类健康和自然资源而颁布的汞允许水平。尽管巴西卫生当局无法检测到确凿的人类汞中毒证据,但在未采取缓解措施的情况下,采矿人口和周边地区存在发生汞中毒流行的可能性。在美国,环境汞污染主要源于历史上的金矿开采作业,内华达州部分地区的汞污染仍很严重,对食肉鱼类和食鱼鸟类的繁殖构成危害。对敏感的代表性自然资源具有致死性的总汞浓度范围为:水生生物的介质中为0.1至2.0微克/升;鸟类急性经口摄入为2200至31000微克/千克体重,经饮食摄入为从4000至40000微克/千克;哺乳动物每日剂量为100至500微克/千克体重,经饮食摄入为1000至5000微克/千克。在水浓度为0.03 - 0.1微克汞/升时,在选定的水生物种中观察到了显著的亚致死性不良影响。对于一些鸟类,主要对繁殖的不良影响与羽毛中总汞浓度(微克/千克鲜重)5000、蛋中900、饮食中50 - 100以及每日摄入量640微克/千克体重有关。当每日摄入量为250微克/千克体重、饮食水平为1100微克/千克或组织浓度超过1100微克/千克时,敏感的非人类哺乳动物显示出汞的显著不良影响。提议的保护水生生物的汞标准范围为:淡水生物为0.012微克/升,海洋生物为0.025微克/升;对于鸟类,饮食鲜重中低于100微克/千克;对于小型哺乳动物,饮食鲜重中低于1100微克/千克。所有这些提议的标准充其量只能提供最低限度的保护。