Engler S, Flechtenmacher C, Wiedemann K H, Gugler R, Stremmel W, Kallinowski B
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany.
J Viral Hepat. 2004 Jan;11(1):60-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1352-0504.2003.00463.x.
Pilot studies have suggested that the addition of amantadine to interferon (IFN) is effective against hepatitis C virus (HCV). Furthermore, IFN induction therapy seems to improve virological response rates. In this open, randomized, multicentre trial we compared safety and efficacy of a triple therapy comprising IFN alpha 2a, ribavirin and amantadine using high induction doses (6 MU IFN alpha daily for the first 6 weeks) against a therapy with standard IFN alpha dosages over the entire treatment period plus amantadine and ribavirin. A total of 158 naive patients with chronic HCV infection were randomized 1:1. Group A (n = 81): induction therapy with 6 MU IFN alpha daily for 6 weeks, followed by 6 MU three times a week (tiw) for 18 weeks and then 3 MU tiw until week 48. Group B (n = 77): standard therapy with 6 MU IFN alpha tiw for 24 weeks, followed by 3 MU until week 48. All patients received oral ribavirin (10 mg/kg/day) and amantadine (200 mg/day). The triple therapy was safe and well tolerated. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to biochemical response rates. Groups A and B did not differ in virological response rates at the end of treatment (33%vs 35%) or at the end of the 6 month follow up period (37%vs 39%). We could not detect favourable effects on sustained virological response rates using induction therapy, in either genotype 1 or non-1 infected patients. In summary, induction therapy with 6 MU IFN alpha daily did not result in increased overall response rates compared with standard IFN alpha dosages of 6 MU tiw.
初步研究表明,在干扰素(IFN)中添加金刚烷胺对丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)有效。此外,IFN诱导疗法似乎能提高病毒学应答率。在这项开放性、随机、多中心试验中,我们比较了一种三联疗法(包括使用高诱导剂量的IFNα2a、利巴韦林和金刚烷胺,前6周每天6 MU IFNα)与在整个治疗期间使用标准IFNα剂量加金刚烷胺和利巴韦林的疗法的安全性和疗效。总共158例初治慢性HCV感染患者被随机分为1:1两组。A组(n = 81):前6周每天用6 MU IFNα进行诱导治疗,随后18周每周3次(tiw)用6 MU,然后直到第48周每周3次用3 MU。B组(n = 77):标准疗法,每周3次用6 MU IFNα治疗24周,随后直到第48周用3 MU。所有患者均接受口服利巴韦林(10 mg/kg/天)和金刚烷胺(200 mg/天)。三联疗法安全且耐受性良好。两组在生化应答率方面无显著差异。A组和B组在治疗结束时(33%对35%)或6个月随访期结束时(37%对39%)的病毒学应答率无差异。在1型或非1型感染患者中,我们均未检测到诱导疗法对持续病毒学应答率有有利影响。总之,与每周3次6 MU的标准IFNα剂量相比,每天6 MU IFNα的诱导疗法并未提高总体应答率。