• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗补助计划的类别资格要求有多严格?审视九个南方州的情况。

How restrictive are Medicaid's categorical eligibility requirements? A look at nine Southern states.

作者信息

Capilouto E, Thorpe K E, Dailey T E

机构信息

University of Alabama School of Public Health, Lister Hill Center for Health Policy.

出版信息

Inquiry. 1992 Winter;29(4):451-6.

PMID:1473868
Abstract

Medicaid, as an existing program with federal matching dollars, remains attractive to state legislatures looking for a means to address the problems of the uninsured. However, the extent to which states can maximize coverage of the poor uninsured under Medicaid's present eligibility criteria is unknown. Surprisingly, this study of nine Southern states shows a modest 14.8% reduction in the uninsured population when the AFDC income eligibility threshold is moved up to the federal poverty level. This threshold is twice as high as the national mean and three times greater than the mean income eligibility threshold for the nine states that were the focus of this study. In sharp contrast, elimination of the categorical eligibility requirements under the same poverty-level threshold reduces the uninsured population by nearly 40%.

摘要

医疗补助计划作为一个有联邦配套资金的现有项目,对于寻求解决未参保者问题方法的州立法机构来说仍然具有吸引力。然而,在医疗补助计划目前的资格标准下,各州能在多大程度上最大限度地覆盖贫困未参保者尚不清楚。令人惊讶的是,这项对九个南方州的研究表明,当将“对有子女家庭补助计划”(AFDC)的收入资格门槛提高到联邦贫困水平时,未参保人口仅适度减少了14.8%。这个门槛是全国平均水平的两倍,是本研究重点关注的九个州平均收入资格门槛的三倍。形成鲜明对比的是,在相同贫困水平门槛下取消类别资格要求,未参保人口减少了近40%。

相似文献

1
How restrictive are Medicaid's categorical eligibility requirements? A look at nine Southern states.医疗补助计划的类别资格要求有多严格?审视九个南方州的情况。
Inquiry. 1992 Winter;29(4):451-6.
2
Consequences of alternative programs to cover the uninsured in central southern states.美国中南部各州为未参保者提供医保替代方案的后果。
J Health Soc Policy. 1993;5(1):33-42. doi: 10.1300/J045v05n01_04.
3
Effects of state reforms on health insurance coverage of adults.国家改革对成年人医疗保险覆盖范围的影响。
Inquiry. 1998 Fall;35(3):280-93.
4
When more means less. Utah gets federal approval limiting Medicaid services to some to provide a basic health package to 25,000 low-income uninsured.当“多”意味着“少”时。犹他州获得联邦批准,限制为部分人群提供医疗补助服务,以便为2.5万名低收入未参保者提供基本医疗套餐。
Mod Healthc. 2002 Feb 18;32(7):6-7.
5
The Oregon experience. Must doctors lose money with managed Medicaid?俄勒冈州的经历。医生在管理式医疗补助计划中一定会亏损吗?
Manag Care. 1997 Nov;6(11):45-6, 49-50.
6
Covering uninsured adults through Medicaid: lessons from the Oregon health plan.通过医疗补助计划覆盖未参保成年人:来自俄勒冈州医疗计划的经验教训。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2000 Winter;22(2):119-35.
7
The Health Insurance Flexibility and Accountability (HIFA) Demonstration program. A new initiative to cover the uninsured.健康保险灵活性与责任性(HIFA)示范项目。一项覆盖未参保者的新举措。
Physician Exec. 2001 Nov-Dec;27(6):74-6.
8
Medicaid program; eligibility and coverage requirements--HCFA. Final rule with comment period.医疗补助计划;资格与覆盖范围要求——医疗保健财务管理局。附意见征求期的最终规定。
Fed Regist. 1993 Jan 19;58(11):4908-39.
9
Medicaid. Tennessee receives extension for managed-care program.
AIDS Policy Law. 2002 Feb 1;17(2):3.
10
MediCrunch. A federal Medicaid cap will only shift the pain to the local level.医疗紧缩。联邦医疗补助上限只会将痛苦转移到地方层面。
Health Syst Rev. 1995 May-Jun;28(3):15-6.