Marom Edith M, Herndon James E, Kim Yun Hyeon, McAdams H Page
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Radiology. 2004 Mar;230(3):824-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2303030315. Epub 2004 Jan 22.
To evaluate and classify the various drainage patterns of the pulmonary veins as depicted with thin-section chest computed tomography (CT).
Thin-section (2.5-mm collimation) contrast material-enhanced CT scans of 201 consecutive patients obtained over a 3-month period for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (n = 197), pulmonary vein stenosis (n = 2), or aortic injury (n = 2) were routinely reviewed in transverse and (if necessary) coronal and coronal-oblique imaging planes. A classification was formulated based on both the number of venous ostia on each side and the drainage patterns of pulmonary veins. The frequency of each pattern was determined, and association with atrial arrhythmia was assessed with the chi(2) and Fisher exact tests.
Most patients (n = 142, 71%) had two ostia on the right side for upper and lower lobe veins. Fifty-six patients (28%) had three to five ostia on the right side, which were due to one or two separate middle lobe vein ostia in 52 (26%) patients. Three patients (2%) had a single venous ostium on the right side. Most patients (n = 173, 86%) had two ostia on the left side for upper and lower lobe veins. The remainder (n = 28, 14%) had a single ostium. There was no significant association between any particular venous drainage pattern and atrial arrhythmia; however, patients with a separate ostia for the right middle lobe pulmonary vein(s) tended to have a higher frequency of atrial arrhythmia than those with other patterns (P =.053).
A classification system to succinctly describe pulmonary venous drainage patterns was developed. Right-sided venous drainage was more variable than left-sided venous drainage. One-quarter of patients had more than two venous ostia on the right side.
通过胸部薄层计算机断层扫描(CT)评估和分类肺静脉的各种引流模式。
对连续201例患者在3个月内进行的胸部薄层(2.5毫米准直)对比剂增强CT扫描进行回顾,这些扫描用于诊断肺栓塞(n = 197)、肺静脉狭窄(n = 2)或主动脉损伤(n = 2),常规在横断位以及(如有必要)冠状位和冠状斜位成像平面进行观察。根据每侧静脉开口的数量以及肺静脉的引流模式制定了一种分类方法。确定每种模式的频率,并使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验评估与房性心律失常的相关性。
大多数患者(n = 142,71%)右侧上叶和下叶静脉有两个开口。56例患者(28%)右侧有三到五个开口,其中52例(26%)是由于一到两个单独的中叶静脉开口。3例患者(2%)右侧有单个静脉开口。大多数患者(n = 173,86%)左侧上叶和下叶静脉有两个开口。其余患者(n = 28,14%)有单个开口。任何特定的静脉引流模式与房性心律失常之间均无显著相关性;然而,右侧中叶肺静脉有单独开口的患者房性心律失常的发生率往往高于其他模式的患者(P = 0.053)。
开发了一种简洁描述肺静脉引流模式的分类系统。右侧静脉引流比左侧静脉引流更具变异性。四分之一的患者右侧有两个以上的静脉开口。