Genetically modified organisms. Experts recommend a cautious approach.
作者信息
Stokstad Erik
出版信息
Science. 2004 Jan 23;303(5657):449. doi: 10.1126/science.303.5657.449a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Genetically modified organisms. Experts recommend a cautious approach.转基因生物。专家建议采取谨慎的态度。
Science. 2004 Jan 23;303(5657):449. doi: 10.1126/science.303.5657.449a.
2
NAS asks for more scrutiny of GM crops.美国国家科学院要求对转基因作物进行更严格的审查。
Science. 2002 Mar 1;295(5560):1619-20. doi: 10.1126/science.295.5560.1619a.
3
National academy panel urges USDA to toughen reviews of transgenic plants.国家科学院小组敦促美国农业部加强对转基因植物的审查。
Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Apr;20(4):323-4. doi: 10.1038/nbt0402-323.
4
Verdict still out on biotech crops.转基因作物尚无定论。
Science. 2010 May 28;328(5982):1105-6. doi: 10.1126/science.328.5982.1105-f.
5
Agriculture. Biotech crops good for farmers and environment, Academy finds.农业。学会发现，转基因作物对农民和环境有益。
Science. 2010 Apr 16;328(5976):295. doi: 10.1126/science.328.5976.295-a.
6
Fatal flaws in agbiotech regulatory policies.农业生物技术监管政策中的致命缺陷。
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Jul;25(7):725-7. doi: 10.1038/nbt0707-725.
7
Agbiotech. Report says India needs stronger, independent regulatory body.农业生物技术。报告称印度需要一个更强大、独立的监管机构。
Science. 2004 Jun 11;304(5677):1579. doi: 10.1126/science.304.5677.1579a.
8
Environmental regulation. U.S. courts say transgenic crops need tighter scrutiny.环境监管。美国法院称转基因作物需要更严格的审查。
Science. 2007 Feb 23;315(5815):1069. doi: 10.1126/science.315.5815.1069.
9
Risks of genetically engineered crops.转基因作物的风险。
Science. 2003 Sep 26;301(5641):1845; author reply 1845. doi: 10.1126/science.301.5641.1845d.
10
Animal biotechnology. Environmental impact seen as biggest risk.动物生物技术。环境影响被视为最大风险。
Science. 2002 Aug 23;297(5585):1257. doi: 10.1126/science.297.5585.1257a.
Zotero 插件