Vardas Panos E, Kochiadakis George E
Cardiology Department, Heraklion University Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Sep;7(3):297-9. doi: 10.1023/B:CEPR.0000012400.34597.00.
Although the use of amiodarone for the treatment of atrial fibrillation has increased, reports of its use for the restoration of sinus rhythm have been conflicting. In a recent prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo controlled study, we examined the efficacy and safety of amiodarone as initial treatment to restore sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation of varying duration. We studied 335 patients (169 men, 166 women), aged 27-78 years (mean age 65 +/- 10 years), with symptomatic atrial fibrillation, who presented to the emergency room or to our clinic. Patients randomized to amiodarone ( n = 173) received 300 mg intravenously over 1 hour followed by 20 mg/kg over 24 hours. Oral administration was initiated simultaneously at 600 mg/day in 3 divided doses for one week followed by 400 mg/day, in two doses, for three weeks. Amiodarone was almost twice as likely as placebo to restore sinus rhythm (85% vs. 43%, p < 0.0001). Larger left atrial size and longer duration of atrial fibrillation decreased amiodarone's effectiveness. These factors were also associated with longer duration of treatment before conversion to sinus rhythm. We observed relatively few and only minor complications despite relatively high doses of amiodarone administered to achieve high serum concentrations. In conclusion, our findings indicate that amiodarone is an effective and safe antiarrhythmic drug even when administered in large doses. It may be used for the restoration of sinus rhythm when rapid cardioversion is not needed.
尽管胺碘酮用于治疗心房颤动的情况有所增加,但其用于恢复窦性心律的报道却相互矛盾。在最近一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、安慰剂对照研究中,我们研究了胺碘酮作为初始治疗手段恢复不同病程心房颤动患者窦性心律的疗效和安全性。我们研究了335例(169例男性,166例女性)年龄在27至78岁(平均年龄65±10岁)、有症状的心房颤动患者,这些患者到急诊室或我们的诊所就诊。随机接受胺碘酮治疗的患者(n = 173)在1小时内静脉注射300mg,随后在24小时内静脉注射20mg/kg。同时开始口服给药,初始剂量为600mg/天,分3次服用,持续1周,随后为400mg/天,分2次服用,持续3周。胺碘酮恢复窦性心律的可能性几乎是安慰剂的两倍(85%对43%,p < 0.0001)。左心房较大和心房颤动持续时间较长会降低胺碘酮的有效性。这些因素也与转为窦性心律前的治疗时间较长有关。尽管为达到高血清浓度而给予了相对高剂量的胺碘酮,但我们观察到的并发症相对较少且较轻微。总之,我们的研究结果表明,即使大剂量给药,胺碘酮也是一种有效且安全的抗心律失常药物。在不需要快速心脏复律时,它可用于恢复窦性心律。