• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的再狭窄——药物洗脱支架是答案吗?

Restenosis in percutaneous coronary intervention--is drug-eluting stent the answer?

作者信息

Lim V Y T, Lim Y L

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singapore 529889.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 2003 Sep;44(9):482-7.

PMID:14740779
Abstract

The long-term success of percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of coronary artery disease is hampered by the occurrence of restenosis, which often necessitates repeat hospitalisations or coronary interventions. The advent of drug-eluting stents, particularly those coated with sirolimus and paclitaxel, may be the breakthrough in the battle against restenosis that interventional cardiologists have been waiting for, and we review the currently available evidence for this. Despite the growing enthusiasm, we should not forget that this new technology is still in its relative infancy, and there remain many unanswered questions, particularly about the long-term effect of using these stents.

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠心病的长期成功受到再狭窄发生的阻碍,而再狭窄常常需要再次住院或进行冠状动脉介入治疗。药物洗脱支架的出现,尤其是那些涂有西罗莫司和紫杉醇的支架,可能是介入心脏病学家一直在等待的对抗再狭窄的突破,我们对此回顾目前可得的证据。尽管热情日益高涨,但我们不应忘记这项新技术仍处于相对初期阶段,仍有许多未解决的问题,尤其是关于使用这些支架的长期影响。

相似文献

1
Restenosis in percutaneous coronary intervention--is drug-eluting stent the answer?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的再狭窄——药物洗脱支架是答案吗?
Singapore Med J. 2003 Sep;44(9):482-7.
2
Drug-eluting stent: the emerging technique for the prevention of restenosis.药物洗脱支架:预防再狭窄的新兴技术。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2002 Oct;50(5):443-53.
3
The paclitaxel-eluting stent in percutaneous coronary intervention: Part II. Comparison with the sirolimus-eluting stent, economics, and unanswered questions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的紫杉醇洗脱支架:第二部分。与西罗莫司洗脱支架的比较、经济学及未解决的问题。
Cardiol Rev. 2006 May-Jun;14(3):143-50. doi: 10.1097/01.crd.0000214683.72810.87.
4
Through the drug-eluting stent labyrinth.穿过药物洗脱支架迷宫。
Ital Heart J. 2003 Apr;4(4):236-45.
5
Drug-eluting stents: preventing restenosis.药物洗脱支架:预防再狭窄。
Cardiol Rev. 2007 Jan-Feb;15(1):1-12. doi: 10.1097/01.crd.0000200844.16899.fc.
6
Outcome in the real-world of coronary high-risk intervention with drug-eluting stents (ORCHID) -- a single-center study comparing Cypher sirolimus-eluting with Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stents.药物洗脱支架用于冠状动脉高危干预的真实世界结果(ORCHID)——一项比较西罗莫司洗脱Cypher支架与紫杉醇洗脱Taxus支架的单中心研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Nov;68(5):663-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20741.
7
Drug-eluting coronary stents: many meta-analyses, little benefit.药物洗脱冠状动脉支架:众多荟萃分析,获益寥寥。
Prescrire Int. 2009 Apr;18(100):70-4.
8
Choosing a drug-eluting stent: a comparison between CYPHER and TAXUS.选择药物洗脱支架:CYPHER与TAXUS的比较。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2005;6 Suppl 1:S13-21.
9
Polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents in percutaneous coronary intervention: a review of the TAXUS trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中基于聚合物的紫杉醇洗脱支架:TAXUS试验综述
J Interv Cardiol. 2004 Oct;17(5):271-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2004.04040.x.
10
Paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.用于无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的紫杉醇洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架的比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 12;53(19):1760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.035.