Bliss Irina, Kujala Teija, Hämäläinen Heikki
Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Turku, Assistentinkatu 7, FIN-20014, Turku, Finland.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Feb;18(3):273-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.012.
The performance in letter recognition of 21 blind participants was compared with that of 16 age-matched sighted participants in an n-back working memory task. Blind participants were tested tactually with series of raised letters and Braille characters, and sighted participants tactually with series of raised letters and visually with series of letters presented on a computer screen. With this approach, we wanted to compare the tactual performances by trained (blind) and non-trained (sighted) participants, and tactual and visual performances by trained (blind and sighted, respectively) participants. Increments of mnemonic load increased the number of incorrect responses significantly in all n-back tasks. As expected, the blind participants outperformed the sighted ones statistically significantly in the tactile raised letters n-back task. The sighted participants produced significantly fewer incorrect responses in the visual task than the blind participants in the raised letters task, whereas there was no such difference between sighted subjects' visual performance and blind subjects' tactile performance in the Braille task. These results demonstrate the degree and limits to which everyday practice develops perceptual skills either in persons without sensory deficits (vision and visual environment), or persons with severe sensory loss (blindness and tactile environment). The performance level of blind persons relying on their tactile skills is just about the same as that of sighted subjects relying on their visual skills.
在一项n-back工作记忆任务中,对21名盲人参与者的字母识别表现与16名年龄匹配的视力正常参与者的表现进行了比较。盲人参与者通过一系列凸起字母和盲文字符进行触觉测试,视力正常的参与者通过一系列凸起字母进行触觉测试,并通过计算机屏幕上呈现的一系列字母进行视觉测试。通过这种方法,我们想比较受过训练的(盲人)和未受过训练的(视力正常的)参与者的触觉表现,以及受过训练的(分别为盲人和视力正常的)参与者的触觉和视觉表现。在所有n-back任务中,记忆负荷的增加显著增加了错误反应的数量。正如预期的那样,在触觉凸起字母n-back任务中,盲人参与者在统计学上的表现明显优于视力正常的参与者。在视觉任务中,视力正常的参与者产生的错误反应明显少于在凸起字母任务中的盲人参与者,而在盲文任务中,视力正常的参与者的视觉表现与盲人参与者的触觉表现之间没有这种差异。这些结果表明,在没有感觉缺陷的人(视觉和视觉环境)或有严重感觉丧失的人(失明和触觉环境)中,日常实践发展感知技能的程度和局限性。依靠触觉技能的盲人的表现水平与依靠视觉技能的视力正常的人的表现水平大致相同。