Everly Matthew J, Heaton Pamela C, Cluxton Robert J
Division of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Feb;38(2):286-93. doi: 10.1345/aph.1C472. Epub 2003 Dec 30.
To review the clinical benefits of beta-blockers as secondary prevention following a myocardial infarction (MI) and to address the reasons that clinicians are reluctant to use beta-blockers in specific patient populations.
MEDLINE was searched for articles published from January 1966 to October 2002. Relevant studies were identified by systematic searches of the literature for all reported studies of associations between beta-blocker underuse and secondary prevention of MI. Additional studies were identified by a hand search of references of original or review articles.
English-language human studies were selected and analyzed.
Associations were observed in studies of beta-blocker use as secondary prevention of MI. A lower rate of beta-blocker treatment occurred in older patients and in patients with comorbid conditions such as diabetes, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and peripheral arterial disease. In addition, underuse was attributed to the perception of high rates of adverse events associated with beta-blockers. beta-Blocker use as secondary prevention of an MI can lead to a 19-48% decrease in mortality and up to a 28% decrease in reinfarction rates. Nonetheless, beta-blockers are significantly underused in many patient populations due to concomitant disease states. Due to their normal physiologic deterioration, the elderly are at an increased risk of low cardiac output and bradycardia when given a beta-blocker; therefore, they should be started on a low dose that is then slowly titrated. In diabetic patients, beta-blockers can impair glucose control leading to hypoglycemia; therefore, post-MI diabetic patients must routinely monitor their blood glucose levels. In patients with decompensated heart failure, beta-blocker use can lead to further cardiac depression, but lower oral starting doses with slow titration can reduce this risk. beta-Blockers can induce bronchospasm in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, but cardioselective beta-blockers and appropriate use of medications such as albuterol can minimize these effects. Finally, in patients with peripheral arterial disease, with the exception of hypertensive patients with Reynaud's phenomenon, beta-blockers can be used safely. The only absolute contraindications to beta-blockers are severe bradycardia, preexisting sick sinus syndrome, second- and third-degree atrioventricular block, severe left ventricular dysfunction, active peripheral vascular disease with rest ischemia, or reactive airway disease so severe that airway support is required.
Overall, the cardiovascular benefits of beta-blockers as secondary prevention of MI significantly outweigh the risks associated with their use.
回顾β受体阻滞剂作为心肌梗死(MI)二级预防的临床益处,并探讨临床医生在特定患者群体中不愿使用β受体阻滞剂的原因。
检索MEDLINE中1966年1月至2002年10月发表的文章。通过系统检索文献,查找所有关于β受体阻滞剂使用不足与MI二级预防之间关联的报道研究,以确定相关研究。通过手工检索原始文章或综述文章的参考文献,确定其他研究。
选择并分析英文的人体研究。
在β受体阻滞剂用于MI二级预防的研究中观察到了关联。老年患者以及患有糖尿病、心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、哮喘和外周动脉疾病等合并症的患者中,β受体阻滞剂治疗率较低。此外,使用不足归因于认为与β受体阻滞剂相关的不良事件发生率高。β受体阻滞剂作为MI的二级预防可使死亡率降低19%至48%,再梗死率降低多达28%。尽管如此,由于合并疾病状态,β受体阻滞剂在许多患者群体中仍未得到充分使用。由于老年人正常的生理衰退,给予β受体阻滞剂时发生低心输出量和心动过缓的风险增加;因此,应从小剂量开始,然后缓慢滴定。在糖尿病患者中,β受体阻滞剂会损害血糖控制,导致低血糖;因此,MI后糖尿病患者必须常规监测血糖水平。在失代偿性心力衰竭患者中,使用β受体阻滞剂可导致进一步的心功能抑制,但口服起始剂量较低并缓慢滴定可降低这种风险。β受体阻滞剂可在慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘患者中诱发支气管痉挛,但心脏选择性β受体阻滞剂以及适当使用沙丁胺醇等药物可将这些影响降至最低。最后,在外周动脉疾病患者中,除患有雷诺现象的高血压患者外,β受体阻滞剂可安全使用。β受体阻滞剂的唯一绝对禁忌证是严重心动过缓、既往病态窦房结综合征、二度和三度房室传导阻滞、严重左心室功能障碍、伴有静息缺血的活动性外周血管疾病或严重到需要气道支持的反应性气道疾病。
总体而言,β受体阻滞剂作为MI二级预防的心血管益处明显超过其使用相关的风险。