Gultekin Pınar, Pak Tunc Elif, Ongul Deger, Turp Volkan, Bultan Ozgur, Karataslı Burcin
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Turkey.
J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2015 Apr 29;49(2):8-16. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.97059. eCollection 2015.
Adequate polymerization is a crucial factor in obtaining optimal physical properties and a satisfying clinical performance from composite resin materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the polymerization efficiency of dual-cure resin cement cured with two different light curing units under zirconia structures having differing thicknesses.
4 zirconia discs framework in 4 mm diameter and in 0.5 mm, 1 mm and 1.5 mm thickness were prepared using computer-aided design system. One of the 0.5 mm-thick substructures was left as mono-layered whereas others were layered with feldspathic porcelain of same thickness and ceramic samples with 4 different thicknesses (0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2.0 mm) were prepared. For each group (n=12) resin cement was light cured in polytetrafluoroethylene molds using Light Emitting Diode (LED) or Quartz-Tungsten Halogen (QHT) light curing units under each of 4 zirconia based discs (n=96). The values of depth of cure (in mm) and the Vickers Hardness Number values (VHN) were evaluated for each specimen.
The use of LED curing unit produced a greater depth of cure compared to QTH under ceramic discs with 0.5 and 1 mm thickness (p<0.05).At 100μm and 300 μm depth, the LED unit produced significantly greater VHN values compared to the QTH unit (p<0.05). At 500 μm depth, the difference between the VHN values of LED and QTH groups were not statistically significant.
Light curing may not result in adequate resin cement polymerization under thick zirconia structures. LED light sources should be preferred over QTH for curing dual-cure resin cements, especially for those under thicker zirconia restorations.
充分聚合是从复合树脂材料获得最佳物理性能和令人满意的临床性能的关键因素。本研究的目的是评估在不同厚度的氧化锆结构下,用两种不同的光固化装置固化的双固化树脂水门汀的聚合效率。
使用计算机辅助设计系统制备4个直径4mm、厚度分别为0.5mm、1mm和1.5mm的氧化锆圆盘框架。将其中一个0.5mm厚的子结构保留为单层,而其他的则用相同厚度的长石质瓷分层,并制备出4种不同厚度(0.5、1、1.5和2.0mm)的陶瓷样品。对于每组(n=12),将树脂水门汀在聚四氟乙烯模具中,使用发光二极管(LED)或石英卤钨灯(QHT)光固化装置,在4个基于氧化锆的圆盘下进行光固化(n=96)。对每个试样评估固化深度(以mm为单位)值和维氏硬度数值(VHN)。
在厚度为0.5mm和1mm的陶瓷圆盘下,与QTH相比,使用LED固化装置产生的固化深度更大(p<0.05)。在100μm和300μm深度处,LED装置产生的VHN值显著高于QTH装置(p<0.05)。在500μm深度处,LED组和QTH组的VHN值差异无统计学意义。
在厚氧化锆结构下,光固化可能无法使树脂水门汀充分聚合。对于双固化树脂水门汀的固化,应首选LED光源而非QTH,尤其是对于较厚氧化锆修复体下的树脂水门汀。