Pawlik Timothy M, Perry Allison, Strom Eric A, Babiera Gildy V, Buchholz Thomas A, Singletary Eva, Perkins George H, Ross Merrick I, Schecter Naomi R, Meric-Bernstam Funda, Ames Frederick C, Hunt Kelly K, Kuerer Henry M
Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Cancer. 2004 Feb 1;100(3):490-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11939.
Balloon catheter-based accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative to whole-breast external-beam irradiation during breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for breast carcinoma, but it is limited by the size of the segmental mastectomy cavity. There are scant data on the average or optimal volume of resection (VR) in BCT. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the percentage of patients who would be eligible for balloon catheter-based APBI based on the selection criteria of the American Society of Breast Surgeons and the surgical VR.
The authors reviewed the medical records of 443 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive carcinoma treated with BCT. Patient treatment and pathologic data were analyzed to assess VR and eligibility for APBI.
BCT was performed for 178 patients with DCIS and 267 patients with invasive breast carcinoma. The majority of invasive carcinomas (63.3%) were infiltrating ductal carcinomas. The median overall lumpectomy volume was 67.61 cm3, with no significant difference between DCIS and invasive carcinoma (P>0.05). Although the majority (62.9-82.0%) of patients met the individual selection criteria for APBI, only 27.4% of the cohort was found to be eligible for any type of APBI when the selection criteria were considered together. Based on VR, only approximately one-half of the patients initially eligible for APBI would be candidates for immediate balloon catheter-based APBI using the 70 cm3 balloon device (13.3%). However, with the new, larger 125 cm3 balloon device, approximately three-fourths of patients initially eligible for APBI would be eligible for balloon catheter-based APBI at the time of the initial surgical procedure (20.7%). Although not evaluated in the current study, shrinkage of the lumpectomy cavity with time may increase the number of patients eligible based strictly on VR criteria. Patients with a very large VR (> or =125 cm3) were more likely to have invasive carcinoma (P=0.02; hazard ratio [HR], 7.4) and tumors > or =5 cm on final pathology (P<0.01; HR, 22.0).
Approximately one-fifth to one-fourth of patients presenting for BCT may be eligible for balloon catheter-based APBI according to accepted national guidelines and VR. VR must be considered when selecting patients for balloon catheter-based APBI, because a minority of patients will have a lumpectomy cavity that exceeds the size limit of the current balloon device.
在乳腺癌保乳治疗(BCT)中,基于球囊导管的加速部分乳腺照射(APBI)是全乳外照射的一种替代方法,但受节段性乳房切除腔大小的限制。关于BCT中平均或最佳切除体积(VR)的数据很少。本研究的目的是根据美国乳腺外科医师协会的选择标准和手术VR评估符合基于球囊导管的APBI条件的患者百分比。
作者回顾了443例接受BCT治疗的导管原位癌(DCIS)或浸润性癌患者的病历。分析患者的治疗和病理数据以评估VR和APBI的 eligibility。
对178例DCIS患者和267例浸润性乳腺癌患者进行了BCT。大多数浸润性癌(63.3%)为浸润性导管癌。总体肿块切除体积的中位数为67.61 cm³,DCIS和浸润性癌之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。尽管大多数(62.9%-82.0%)患者符合APBI的个体选择标准,但综合考虑选择标准时,仅27.4%的队列被发现符合任何类型的APBI条件。基于VR,最初符合APBI条件的患者中只有约一半会成为使用70 cm³球囊装置进行即时基于球囊导管的APBI的候选人(13.3%)。然而,使用新的更大的125 cm³球囊装置时,最初符合APBI条件的患者中约四分之三在初次手术时符合基于球囊导管的APBI条件(20.7%)。尽管本研究未进行评估,但随着时间推移肿块切除腔的缩小可能会增加严格基于VR标准符合条件的患者数量。VR非常大(≥125 cm³)的患者更可能患有浸润性癌(P=0.02;风险比[HR],7.4)且最终病理检查时肿瘤≥5 cm(P<0.01;HR,22.0)。
根据公认的国家指南和VR,接受BCT的患者中约五分之一至四分之一可能符合基于球囊导管的APBI条件。在为基于球囊导管的APBI选择患者时必须考虑VR,因为少数患者的肿块切除腔会超过当前球囊装置的尺寸限制。