Suppr超能文献

儿童多导睡眠图检查期间食管压力监测的耐受性

Tolerance of esophageal pressure monitoring during polysomnography in children.

作者信息

Chervin Ronald D, Ruzicka Deborah L, Wiebelhaus Judith L, Hegeman Garnett L, Marriott Deanna J, Marcus Carole L, Giordani Bruno J, Weatherly Robert A, Dillon James E

机构信息

Sleep Disorders Center Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0117, USA.

出版信息

Sleep. 2003 Dec 15;26(8):1022-6. doi: 10.1093/sleep/26.8.1022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess tolerance of esophageal pressure monitoring (EPM) among 5- to 13-year-old children during research polysomnography at study entry and again 1 year later.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study.

SETTING

University-based sleep laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Children scheduled for adenotonsillectomy or hernia repair.

INTERVENTIONS

None; all operations were performed for clinical indications only.

RESULTS

Forty-two of 336 families approached about the study declined to participate mainly to avoid EPM. The EPM was usually the main concern for the 47 adenotonsillectomy and 7 hernia-repair patients and families who did participate. Among 54 enrolled subjects, 51 allowed attempts at insertion of the esophageal catheter, and insertion was successful in all cases; 38 tolerated EPM for at least 2 hours; 33 maintained EPM for the entire night; and 36 had repeat EPM 1 year later for at least 2 hours. Reasons for EPM failure included crying at insertion, vomiting, pain, and inadvertent catheter removal during sleep. The children who tolerated EPM for at least 2 hours did not differ from other subjects based on age, sex, presence of a disruptive behavior disorder, anxiety, tonsil size, history of tonsillitis, or body mass index (all P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The EPM was well tolerated in most school-aged volunteers, but many families did not volunteer, and some children were not able to endure EPM for at least 2 hours. Although better success might be achieved in clinical settings if EPM is medically indicated and not part of voluntary research, EPM is still likely to create significant concern, for children and parents, that must be weighed against anticipated benefits.

摘要

目的

评估5至13岁儿童在研究性多导睡眠图检查开始时以及1年后对食管压力监测(EPM)的耐受性。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

地点

大学睡眠实验室。

参与者

计划进行腺样体扁桃体切除术或疝气修补术的儿童。

干预措施

无;所有手术仅根据临床指征进行。

结果

在约336个被邀请参与研究的家庭中,42个家庭拒绝参与,主要是为了避免进行食管压力监测。对于47名腺样体扁桃体切除术患者和7名疝气修补术患者及其家庭而言,食管压力监测通常是主要顾虑。在54名登记受试者中,51名允许尝试插入食管导管,所有病例均成功插入;38名耐受食管压力监测至少2小时;33名整夜维持食管压力监测;36名1年后再次进行食管压力监测至少2小时。食管压力监测失败的原因包括插入时哭闹、呕吐、疼痛以及睡眠期间意外拔除导管。耐受食管压力监测至少2小时的儿童在年龄、性别、是否存在破坏性行为障碍、焦虑、扁桃体大小、扁桃体炎病史或体重指数方面与其他受试者无差异(所有P>.05)。

结论

大多数学龄志愿者对食管压力监测耐受性良好,但许多家庭未参与,一些儿童无法耐受食管压力监测至少2小时。如果食管压力监测有医学指征且不属于自愿研究,那么在临床环境中可能会取得更好的成功率,但对于儿童和家长而言,食管压力监测仍可能引发重大顾虑,必须与预期益处相权衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验