Weatherly Robert A, Ruzicka Deborah L, Marriott Deanna J, Chervin Ronald D
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Nov;131(5):727-31. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.06.699.
Several studies suggest that a reliable diagnosis of childhood sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) requires polysomnography (PSG). We compared clinical and PSG-based diagnoses in children scheduled for adenotonsillectomy (AT). Parent responses on a validated Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire were used to determine which symptoms could help identify children with clinical diagnoses of SDB but normal PSG.
Thirty-four children aged 5.0 to 12.9 years and scheduled for AT to treat clinically diagnosed sleep-disordered breathing underwent laboratory-based PSG. Results were scored by 3 different criteria: 1) >1 obstructive apnea (2 breaths or longer) per hour of sleep; 2) >5 apneas or hypopneas per hour of sleep; or 3) >1 apnea, hypopnea, or respiratory event-related arousal per hour of sleep.
Depending on the criterion used, the PSG documented SDB from a minimum of 18/34 subjects (53%, for criterion I) to as many as 30/34 subjects (88%, for criterion III). Among symptoms studied, absence of daytime mouth breathing and habitual snoring were most helpful in identification of children who had no evidence of SDB on PSG, by criterion I (Chi-square, P < 0.05). The absence of other common symptoms, such as "loud snoring" or "trouble breathing" at night, were not helpful.
Children with clinical diagnoses of SDB may not consistently meet PSG criteria for this disorder. Questions about daytime mouth breathing and habitual snoring might help clinicians recognize children who would not have SDB on objective testing.
Clinical identification of SDB confirmable on PSG could be improved. However, available outcome data do not yet clarify whether clinical or PSG criteria best identify children likely to suffer morbidity from SDB.
C.
多项研究表明,可靠诊断儿童睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)需要进行多导睡眠图(PSG)检查。我们比较了计划接受腺样体扁桃体切除术(AT)的儿童的临床诊断和基于PSG的诊断。使用经过验证的儿科睡眠问卷中的家长反馈来确定哪些症状有助于识别临床诊断为SDB但PSG正常的儿童。
34名年龄在5.0至12.9岁之间、计划接受AT治疗临床诊断的睡眠呼吸障碍的儿童接受了基于实验室的PSG检查。结果根据3种不同标准进行评分:1)每小时睡眠中出现>1次阻塞性呼吸暂停(持续2次呼吸或更长时间);2)每小时睡眠中出现>5次呼吸暂停或低通气;或3)每小时睡眠中出现>1次呼吸暂停、低通气或与呼吸事件相关的觉醒。
根据所使用的标准,PSG记录的SDB病例最少为18/34名受试者(53%,标准I),最多为30/34名受试者(88%,标准III)。在所研究的症状中,根据标准I,白天无口呼吸和习惯性打鼾对识别PSG检查无SDB证据的儿童最有帮助(卡方检验,P<0.05)。其他常见症状的缺失,如夜间“大声打鼾”或“呼吸困难”,则没有帮助。
临床诊断为SDB的儿童可能不符合该疾病的PSG标准。关于白天口呼吸和习惯性打鼾的问题可能有助于临床医生识别客观检查无SDB的儿童。
PSG可确诊的SDB的临床识别可能会得到改善。然而,现有的结果数据尚未阐明临床标准还是PSG标准最能识别可能因SDB而患病的儿童。
C级