Stelfox Henry Thomas, Ahmed Sofia B, Fiskio Julie, Bates David W
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Jan;75(1):110-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.09.010.
We sought to develop an explicit evidence-based model of medication monitoring and to evaluate monitoring practices and adverse drug events in patients taking amiodarone at one institution.
We searched MEDLINE (1966 through 2000) for English-language publications providing specific monitoring recommendations for amiodarone. A cross-sectional retrospective chart review of 99 outpatients receiving amiodarone therapy between Jan 1, 2000, and Jan 1, 2001, at a large tertiary-care hospital was performed to assess monitoring practices. Adverse drug events were identified by use of structured implicit reviews. The main outcome measure was the proportion of patients receiving the monitoring recommended in the literature and having amiodarone-related adverse drug events.
Forty-three articles were identified that provided specific monitoring recommendations, although no studies were found that compared the outcomes of patients managed with different monitoring regimens. Overall, 70% of the recommended monitoring criteria were satisfied, although only 9 patients (9%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3%-15%) received all of the recommended monitoring. Variability in monitoring practices was identified at all stages of the monitoring model. Of the patients, 52 (52%; 95% CI, 42%-62%) received minimum baseline evaluations, 22 (22%; 95% CI, 14%-31%) underwent ongoing surveillance, 75 (75%; 95% CI, 61%-89%) had appropriate responses to abnormal surveillance results, and 71 (71%; 95% CI, 62%-80%) had timely follow-up visits. Of the patients, 8 (8%; 95% CI, 3%-13%) had 9 amiodarone-related adverse drug events, of which 3 were judged to be preventable. Interrater agreement for monitoring processes (kappa = 0.83) and adverse drug events (kappa = 0.67) was good.
Current standards for amiodarone toxicity monitoring are based on expert opinion with limited evidence to support most recommendations. Monitoring practices appear to vary significantly, with few patients receiving all of the recommended monitoring. Some amiodarone-related adverse drug events may be preventable and patient safety might be improved with a better understanding of monitoring processes.
我们试图建立一个明确的基于证据的药物监测模型,并评估一家机构中服用胺碘酮患者的监测实践及药物不良事件。
我们检索了MEDLINE(1966年至2000年)中提供胺碘酮具体监测建议的英文出版物。对一家大型三级医院在2000年1月1日至2001年1月1日期间接受胺碘酮治疗的99名门诊患者进行横断面回顾性病历审查,以评估监测实践。通过结构化隐性审查识别药物不良事件。主要结局指标是接受文献中推荐监测且发生与胺碘酮相关药物不良事件的患者比例。
共识别出43篇提供具体监测建议的文章,不过未发现比较不同监测方案管理患者结局的研究。总体而言,70%的推荐监测标准得到满足,尽管只有9名患者(9%;95%置信区间[95%CI],3% - 15%)接受了所有推荐监测。在监测模型的所有阶段均发现监测实践存在差异。患者中,52名(52%;95%CI,42% - 62%)接受了最低限度的基线评估,22名(22%;95%CI,14% - 31%)接受了持续监测,75名(75%;95%CI,61% - 89%)对异常监测结果有适当反应,71名(71%;95%CI,62% - 80%)进行了及时的随访。患者中,8名(8%;95%CI,3% - 13%)发生了9起与胺碘酮相关的药物不良事件,其中3起被判定为可预防。监测过程的评分者间一致性(kappa = 0.83)和药物不良事件的评分者间一致性(kappa = 0.67)良好。
目前胺碘酮毒性监测标准基于专家意见,支持大多数建议的证据有限。监测实践似乎差异很大,很少有患者接受所有推荐监测。一些与胺碘酮相关的药物不良事件可能是可预防的,更好地理解监测过程可能会提高患者安全性。