Grotz M, Schwermann T, Lefering R, Ruchholtz S, Graf v d Schulenburg J M, Krettek C, Pape H C
Unfallchirurgische Klinik, MHH, Hannover.
Unfallchirurg. 2004 Jan;107(1):68-75. doi: 10.1007/s00113-003-0715-5.
The introduction of diagnosis related groups (DRG) will radically change the payment system for German hospitals. In 2002 the values for most DRG's were published for the german system (G-DRG). The polytrauma working group of the German Trauma Society developed a calculating algorithm to estimate the comprehensive hospital costs for every patient in the German trauma registry. The aim of this study was to compare these costs with the reimbursement according the the G-DRG's for a standardized population of polytrauma patients.
For polytrauma patients treated at Hannover Medical School in 2000 and 2001 the reimbursement according to the G-DRG's was calculated using a base value of 2900 euro. In the same patients the total cost of inpatient treatment was calculated according to the algorithm developed by the polytrauma working group of the German Trauma Society. The difference between these values represents the economic result. This was calculated as an overall result, but also for specific subgroups of patients (injury severity, mortality, G-DRG grouping).
Datasets of 103 polytrauma patients were included. The following G-DRG's were most frequently occuring: A06Z (n=41), A07Z (n=16), W01Z (n=13). All other G-DRG's were documented less than 3 times. The mean reimbursement according to the G-DRG was 21.380+/-12.300 euro for a polytrauma patient. However, the mean hospital cost accounted to 34.274+/-22.501 euro, which resulted in a mean deficit of 12.893+/-15.534 euro. Analysis of subgroups revealed, that an ISS of more than 35 points, patients with a prolonged hospital stay and patients of the G-DRG group A06Z show a particularly negative result.
The comprehensive hospital costs for treating polytrauma patients are on average 12.893 euro higher than the reimbursement according the G-DRG's. For hospitals to be fully reimbursed G-DRG values have to be reconfigured according to the German health care system. Thus, inclusion criteria to specific G-DRG have to be changed and a specific G-DRG group for very severely injured patients needs to be established.
诊断相关分组(DRG)的引入将彻底改变德国医院的支付系统。2002年,德国系统(G-DRG)中大多数DRG的值已公布。德国创伤学会的多发伤工作组开发了一种计算算法,以估算德国创伤登记处中每位患者的综合医院成本。本研究的目的是将这些成本与标准化多发伤患者群体按照G-DRG的报销费用进行比较。
对于2000年和2001年在汉诺威医学院接受治疗的多发伤患者,按照G-DRG计算报销费用时使用的基础值为2900欧元。对于相同的患者,根据德国创伤学会多发伤工作组开发的算法计算住院治疗的总成本。这些值之间的差异代表经济结果。这一结果作为总体结果进行计算,同时也针对特定患者亚组(损伤严重程度、死亡率、G-DRG分组)进行计算。
纳入了103例多发伤患者的数据集。以下G-DRG出现频率最高:A06Z(n = 41)、A07Z(n = 16)、W01Z(n = 13)。所有其他G-DRG记录次数均少于3次。多发伤患者按照G-DRG的平均报销费用为21380±12300欧元。然而,平均医院成本为34274±22501欧元,导致平均亏损12893±15534欧元。亚组分析显示,损伤严重度评分(ISS)超过35分的患者、住院时间延长的患者以及G-DRG组A06Z的患者结果尤其为负。
治疗多发伤患者的综合医院成本平均比按照G-DRG的报销费用高出12893欧元。为使医院获得全额报销,G-DRG值必须根据德国医疗保健系统进行重新配置。因此,必须更改特定G-DRG的纳入标准,并为重伤患者设立特定的G-DRG组。