Quality of randomised controlled trials: caution is important.
作者信息
Brewer Naomi J
出版信息
BMJ. 2004 Jan 31;328(7434):286-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7434.286-c.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Quality of randomised controlled trials: caution is important.
BMJ. 2004 Jan 31;328(7434):286-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7434.286-c.
2
Quality of randomised controlled trials: quality of research may be worse than it appears.
BMJ. 2004 Jan 31;328(7434):286. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7434.286-b.
3
The quality of randomised controlled trials may be better than assumed.
BMJ. 2004 Jan 3;328(7430):24-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.24.
4
Quality of randomised controlled trials: quality of trial methods is not good in all disciplines.
BMJ. 2004 Jan 31;328(7434):286. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7434.286-a.
5
Improving the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery.
Int J Surg. 2007 Dec;5(6):376. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.11.002. Epub 2007 Nov 17.
6
Improving the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement.
East Afr Med J. 2002 Jul;79(7):394-6.
7
Consort 2010 statement on randomised controlled trials.
Ir Med J. 2010 May;103(5):132.
8
Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.
Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(12):i-iv, 1-98.
9
Critical appraisal. 5. Randomised controlled trials: questions for valid evidence.
NT Learn Curve. 1999 Jul 7;3(5):6-8.
10
Trend in methodological quality of randomised clinical trials in low back pain.
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005 Aug;19(4):529-39. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.02.001.
本文引用的文献
1
The quality of randomised controlled trials may be better than assumed.
BMJ. 2004 Jan 3;328(7430):24-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.24.
Zotero 插件