Gentry J G, McGlone J J, Miller M F, Blanton J R
Pork Industry Institute, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409-2162, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2004 Jan;82(1):209-17. doi: 10.2527/2004.821209x.
The objective of this experiment was to determine the effect of diverse production systems on pig performance, muscle characteristics, and their relation to pork quality measures. Birth and rearing conditions were evaluated using 48 barrows during the fall/winter months. Pigs were farrowed in either indoor crates or outdoor huts. At weaning, indoor- and outdoor-born pigs were allotted randomly to treatments arranged in a 2 x 2 factorial design with two birth (indoor vs. outdoor) and rearing (indoor vs. outdoor) environments. Pigs housed indoors were on concrete-slatted flooring (1.2 m2/pig), and pigs housed outdoors were on an alfalfa pasture (212 m2/pig). Body weight data were collected. Muscle samples were removed within 1 h postmortem from the longissimus (LM) and semimembranosus (SM) muscles. Muscle samples were stained histochemically to identify type I, IIA, and IIB/X muscle fibers. Boneless loins were collected from the left side of each carcass and aged for 14 d. Objective and subjective color measurements were taken on the longissimus muscle at the 10th rib on d 14 postmortem. Loin chops were evaluated for sensory attributes, shear force, and retail display features. Pigs born outdoors were heavier and had a greater ADG at most growth intervals postweaning (d 28, 56, and 112; P < 0.05) than pigs born indoors. Pigs reared outdoors were heavier (P = 0.02) at d 140 (120.1 vs. 112.9 +/- 4.9 kg), and had higher (P = 0.01) ADG (2.2 vs. 1.9 kg/d) and gain:feed ratios (0.41 vs. 0.37) than did pigs reared indoors. Birth x rearing environment interactions were not significant (P > 0.10) for most measures. Carcass and meat quality measures did not differ (P > 0.05) among treatment groups, but loin chops from outdoor born or reared pigs had higher (P < 0.05) a* values than chops from pigs born or reared indoors. The LM muscle of pigs born outdoors had a higher (P < 0.01) percentage of type I, and a lower (P < 0.05) percentage of type IIA fibers than did pigs born indoors. Pigs reared outdoors had a higher (P < 0.01) percentage of IIA fibers and a lower (P < 0.05) percentage of IIB/X fibers than did pigs reared indoors for the LM and SM muscles. Outdoor production systems may influence growth, pork color, and muscle fiber types.
本实验的目的是确定不同生产系统对猪的生长性能、肌肉特性及其与猪肉品质指标之间关系的影响。在秋冬季节,使用48头公猪对出生和饲养条件进行了评估。仔猪在室内产箱或室外棚舍中产仔。断奶时,将室内出生和室外出生的仔猪随机分配到采用2×2析因设计的处理组中,该设计包含两种出生环境(室内与室外)和饲养环境(室内与室外)。室内饲养的猪采用混凝土板条地板(每头猪1.2平方米),室外饲养的猪则饲养在苜蓿牧场上(每头猪212平方米)。收集了体重数据。在屠宰后1小时内,从背最长肌(LM)和半膜肌(SM)中采集肌肉样本。对肌肉样本进行组织化学染色,以识别I型、IIA型和IIB/X型肌纤维。从每头胴体的左侧采集去骨腰肉,并陈化14天。在屠宰后第14天,对第10肋处的背最长肌进行客观和主观颜色测量。对猪排的感官特性、剪切力和零售展示特征进行了评估。室外出生的猪在断奶后的大多数生长阶段(第28、56和112天)比室内出生的猪更重,平均日增重更高(P<0.05)。在第140天,室外饲养的猪体重更重(P = 0.02)(120.1对112.9±4.9千克),平均日增重更高(P = 0.01)(2.2对1.9千克/天),料重比更高(0.41对0.37),高于室内饲养的猪。对于大多数指标,出生×饲养环境的交互作用不显著(P>0.10)。各处理组之间的胴体和肉质指标没有差异(P>0.05),但室外出生或饲养的猪的猪排的a*值高于室内出生或饲养的猪的猪排(P<0.05)。室外出生的猪的背最长肌中I型纤维的百分比更高(P<0.01),IIA型纤维的百分比更低(P<0.05),低于室内出生的猪。对于背最长肌和半膜肌,室外饲养的猪的IIA型纤维百分比更高(P<0.01),IIB/X型纤维百分比更低(P<0.05),低于室内饲养的猪。室外生产系统可能会影响猪的生长、猪肉颜色和肌纤维类型。