Geyskens Tomas
Int J Psychoanal. 2003 Dec;84(Pt 6):1517-29. doi: 10.1516/002075703322642467.
In this paper the author addresses some problems concerning the relation between attachment theory and psychoanalysis and sketches the outline of a Freudian theory of attachment, based on the ideas of the Hungarian psychoanalyst Imre Hermann. First, he elucidates the fundamental divergence behind the insults and misunderstandings that have dominated the debate between attachment theory and Freudian psychoanalysis: they differ radically in their conceptions of temporality and of the relation between psychopathology and human nature. Second, the author presents Hermann's work on 'Clinging--Going-in-search' (1976) as a theoretical model in which the findings of attachment theory can be integrated in a theory of psychopathology that is radically dimensional and that preserves the methodology of Freudian psychoanalysis. In the third part of the paper, the author discusses the question of whether Hermann's 'clinging instinct' is a primary instinct in the Freudian sense, and whether it is an interesting alternative for Freud's 'death instinct', as Hermann claims.
在本文中，作者探讨了依恋理论与精神分析之间关系的一些问题，并基于匈牙利精神分析学家伊姆雷·赫尔曼的观点勾勒出了一个弗洛伊德式依恋理论的轮廓。首先，他阐明了在依恋理论与弗洛伊德精神分析之间的辩论中占据主导地位的侮辱和误解背后的根本分歧：它们在时间性概念以及精神病理学与人性之间的关系上存在根本差异。其次，作者介绍了赫尔曼1976年关于“ clingin -- Going - in - search”的著作，将其作为一个理论模型，在这个模型中，依恋理论的研究结果可以整合到一个从根本上说是维度性的精神病理学理论中，并且保留了弗洛伊德精神分析的方法论。在论文的第三部分，作者讨论了赫尔曼的“依恋本能”是否是弗洛伊德意义上的一种基本本能，以及它是否如赫尔曼所声称的那样，是弗洛伊德“死亡本能”的一个有趣替代。
