Murdoch A H, Mathias K J, Shepherd D E T
Department of Bio-Medical Physics and Bio-Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
Biomed Mater Eng. 2004;14(1):1-4.
When testing medical implants it is very important to be able to test the implant using a suitable material. In the case of orthopaedic implants the optimum material is bone. Beech wood is considered a suitable substitute for bone as it has a similar Young's modulus in tension. Although it is widely used, no actual comparison of the two materials has been undertaken. The aim of this study was to compare the material properties of beech wood and cortical bone using conventional compression tests. Cortical bone samples 4 mm in diameter and 20 mm in length, were prepared from the tibia of an amputated leg. Beech wood samples were prepared to the same specifications. In compression, the Young's modulus for cortical bone was found to be 27+/-9.9 GPa (mean +/- standard deviation) and for beech wood 2.6+/-1.7 GPa. The failure load for cortical bone was 911+/-207 N and 732+/-62 N for beech wood. Although beech wood has been used as a substitute for bone in some studies, this study has shown that there are significant differences in the properties of the two materials when they are subjected to compression.
在测试医用植入物时,能够使用合适的材料对植入物进行测试非常重要。就骨科植入物而言,最佳材料是骨头。山毛榉木被认为是骨头的合适替代品,因为它在拉伸时具有相似的杨氏模量。尽管它被广泛使用,但尚未对这两种材料进行实际比较。本研究的目的是使用传统压缩试验比较山毛榉木和皮质骨的材料特性。从一条截肢腿的胫骨制备直径4毫米、长度20毫米的皮质骨样本。山毛榉木样本制备成相同规格。在压缩试验中,发现皮质骨的杨氏模量为27±9.9吉帕(平均值±标准差),山毛榉木为2.6±1.7吉帕。皮质骨的破坏载荷为911±207牛,山毛榉木为732±62牛。尽管在一些研究中已将山毛榉木用作骨头的替代品,但本研究表明,这两种材料在受压时的特性存在显著差异。