• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于处理加速运动时局限性的感知和眼动证据。

Perceptual and oculomotor evidence of limitations on processing accelerating motion.

作者信息

Watamaniuk Scott N J, Heinen Stephen J

机构信息

Wright State University, Department of Psychology, Dayton, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2003 Nov 21;3(11):698-709. doi: 10.1167/3.11.5.

DOI:10.1167/3.11.5
PMID:14765954
Abstract

Psychophysical studies have demonstrated that humans are less sensitive to image acceleration than to image speed (e.g., Gottsdanker, 1956; Werkhoven, Snippe, & Toet, 1992). Because there is evidence that a common motion-processing stage subserves perception and pursuit (e.g., Watamaniuk & Heinen, 1999), either pursuit should be similarly impaired in discriminating acceleration or it must receive input from a system different from the one that processes visual motion for perception. We assessed the sensitivity of pursuit to acceleration or speed, and compared the results with those obtained in perceptual experiments done with similar stimuli and tasks. Specifically, observers pursued or made psychophysical judgments of targets that moved at randomly selected base speeds and subsequent accelerations. Oculomotor and psychophysical discrimination were compared by analyzing performance for the entire stimulus set sorted by either target acceleration or speed. Thresholds for pursuit and perception were higher for target acceleration than speed, further evidence that a common motion-processing stage limits the performance of both systems.

摘要

心理物理学研究表明,人类对图像加速度的敏感度低于对图像速度的敏感度(例如,Gottsdanker,1956年;Werkhoven、Snippe和Toet,1992年)。因为有证据表明,一个共同的运动处理阶段服务于感知和追踪(例如,Watamaniuk和Heinen,1999年),所以要么追踪在辨别加速度方面也会受到类似的损害,要么它必须从一个不同于处理视觉运动以进行感知的系统接收输入。我们评估了追踪对加速度或速度的敏感度,并将结果与使用类似刺激和任务进行的感知实验结果进行了比较。具体而言,观察者追踪或以心理物理学方式判断以随机选择的基本速度和随后的加速度移动的目标。通过分析按目标加速度或速度分类的整个刺激集的表现,比较了动眼辨别和心理物理学辨别。追踪和感知的阈值对于目标加速度高于速度,这进一步证明了一个共同的运动处理阶段限制了两个系统的表现。

相似文献

1
Perceptual and oculomotor evidence of limitations on processing accelerating motion.关于处理加速运动时局限性的感知和眼动证据。
J Vis. 2003 Nov 21;3(11):698-709. doi: 10.1167/3.11.5.
2
Precision of speed discrimination and smooth pursuit eye movements.速度辨别精度与平稳跟踪眼球运动
Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(5):514-23. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
3
Visual motion processing for the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements in humans.人类中用于启动平稳跟踪眼球运动的视觉运动处理。
J Neurophysiol. 1986 Oct;56(4):953-68. doi: 10.1152/jn.1986.56.4.953.
4
A comparison of pursuit eye movement and perceptual performance in speed discrimination.速度辨别中追踪眼动与感知性能的比较。
J Vis. 2003 Dec 22;3(11):865-76. doi: 10.1167/3.11.19.
5
Smooth pursuit eye movements to isoluminant targets.对等亮度目标的平稳跟踪眼球运动。
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Sep;100(3):1287-300. doi: 10.1152/jn.00747.2007. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
6
Properties of smooth pursuit and visual motion reaction time to second-order motion stimuli.二阶运动刺激的平滑追踪和视觉运动反应时间的特性。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 14;15(12):e0243430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243430. eCollection 2020.
7
Contrast and assimilation in motion perception and smooth pursuit eye movements.运动感知和平滑跟踪眼球运动中的对比与同化
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Sep;98(3):1355-63. doi: 10.1152/jn.00476.2007. Epub 2007 Jul 18.
8
Age, eye movement and motion discrimination.年龄、眼球运动与运动辨别
Vision Res. 2010 Nov 23;50(23):2588-99. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.015. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
9
Aperture extent and stimulus speed affect the perception of visual acceleration.孔径大小和刺激速度会影响视觉加速度的感知。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):743-752. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4824-0. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
10
Localization of speed differences of context stimuli during fixation and smooth pursuit eye movements.在注视和平滑追踪眼动过程中上下文刺激速度差异的定位
Vision Res. 2010 Dec;50(24):2740-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.028. Epub 2010 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Target interception in virtual reality is better for natural versus unnatural trajectory shapes and orientations.在虚拟现实中,对于自然轨迹形状和方向与非自然轨迹形状和方向而言,目标拦截效果更好。
J Vis. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):11. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.1.11.
2
Anticipatory smooth pursuit eye movements scale with the probability of visual motion: The role of target speed and acceleration.预期性平稳跟踪眼动随视觉运动概率而变化:目标速度和加速度的作用。
J Vis. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):2. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.1.2.
3
Modulation of reaching by spatial attention.空间注意力对伸手动作的调节。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2024 May 15;18:1393690. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1393690. eCollection 2024.
4
A binary acceleration signal reduces overestimation in pedestrians' visual time-to-collision estimation for accelerating vehicles.二元加速度信号可减少行人对加速车辆视觉碰撞时间估计中的高估现象。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 6;10(6):e27483. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27483. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
5
A visual bias for falling objects.对坠落物体的视觉偏向。
Perception. 2024 Mar;53(3):197-207. doi: 10.1177/03010066241228681. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
6
Interception of vertically approaching objects: temporal recruitment of the internal model of gravity and contribution of optical information.垂直接近物体的拦截:重力内部模型的时间性补充及视觉信息的作用
Front Physiol. 2023 Nov 17;14:1266332. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1266332. eCollection 2023.
7
Spatial contextual cues that help predict how a target will accelerate can be used to guide interception.有助于预测目标将如何加速的空间上下文线索可用于引导拦截。
J Vis. 2023 Oct 4;23(12):7. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.12.7.
8
Trial-by-trial feedback fails to improve the consideration of acceleration in visual time-to-collision estimation.逐次反馈未能改善视觉碰撞时间估计中对加速度的考虑。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0288206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288206. eCollection 2023.
9
Humans Can Track But Fail to Predict Accelerating Objects.人类能够跟踪但无法预测加速的物体。
eNeuro. 2022 Sep 12;9(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0185-22.2022. Print 2022 Sep-Oct.
10
Audiovisual interaction with rate-varying signals.与变速信号的视听交互。
Iperception. 2022 Nov 28;13(6):20416695221116653. doi: 10.1177/20416695221116653. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.