Bing Mark N, Whanger James C, Davison H Kristl, VanHook Jayson B
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Feb;89(1):150-7. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.150.
Context-specific personality items provide respondents with a common frame of reference unlike more traditional, noncontextual personality items. The common frame of reference standardizes item interpretation and has been shown to reduce measurement error while increasing validity in comparison to noncontextual items (M. J. Schmit, A. M. Ryan. S. L. Stierwalt. & S. L. Powell, 1995). Although the frame-of-reference effect on personality scales scores has been well investigated (e.g., M. J. Schmit et al., 1995), the ability of this innovation to obtain incremental validity above and beyond the well-established, noncontextual personality scale scores has yet to be examined. The current study replicates and extends work by M. J. Schmit et al. (1995) to determine the incremental validity of the frame-of-reference effect. The results indicate that context-specific personality items do indeed obtain incremental validity above and beyond both noncontextual items and cognitive ability, and in spite of socially desirable responding induced by applicant instructions. The implications of these findings for personnel selection are discussed.
与更传统的、非情境化的人格项目不同,情境特定的人格项目为受访者提供了一个共同的参照框架。这个共同的参照框架使项目解释标准化,并且与非情境化项目相比,已被证明可以减少测量误差并提高效度(M. J. 施密特、A. M. 瑞安、S. L. 施蒂尔沃尔特和S. L. 鲍威尔,1995年)。尽管参照框架对人格量表分数的影响已得到充分研究(例如,M. J. 施密特等人,1995年),但这种创新在已确立的非情境化人格量表分数之外获得增量效度的能力尚未得到检验。当前的研究重复并扩展了M. J. 施密特等人(1995年)的工作,以确定参照框架效应的增量效度。结果表明,情境特定的人格项目确实在非情境化项目和认知能力之外获得了增量效度,尽管申请人指导语引发了社会赞许性反应。讨论了这些发现对人员选拔的影响。