• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内括约肌侧切术后一期伤口闭合的前瞻性随机对照试验。

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of primary wound closure after lateral internal sphincterotomy.

作者信息

Aysan Erhan, Aren Acar, Ayar Erdal

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, SSK Istanbul Educational Hospital, Dikilitas Emirhan Cad. No. 3, Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey 80700.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2004 Feb;187(2):291-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.011
PMID:14769323
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Much of the lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) complications is related to LIS incision. In this study, incisions sutured primarily or left to secondary healing after open LIS procedure are compared regarding the wound healing and complications associated with wounds.

METHODS

Planning a prospective, randomized clinical study, 39 patients were separated into two groups. Open LIS was performed on both of the groups. While the incisions of the patients in group 1 (n = 22) were closed with two interrupted sutures using 3-0 chromic catgut, the incisions of the patients in group 2 (n = 17) were left open. The patients were followed up for 90 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

Hematoma in 1 (4.5%), ecchymosis in 7 (31.8%), and wound infection in 1 (4.5%) developed in patients of group 1. In this group no significant external bleeding was seen. Wound healing duration was 15.05 +/- 5.60 days. In group 2 no hematoma developed (P = 0.98), but 2 (11.7%) ecchymoses (P = 0.25), 4 (23.5%), wound infections (P = 0.14), and 3 (17.6%) postoperative significant external bleedings (P = 0.07) were seen. Wound healing duration was 33.94 +/- 6.67 days (P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

To achieve early wound healing, primary closure of open LIS incision is useful, but this technique has no significant effect on wound-related complications in comparison with secondary healing.

摘要

背景

大部分外侧内括约肌切开术(LIS)并发症与LIS切口有关。在本研究中,比较了开放LIS手术后一期缝合切口或任其二期愈合的伤口愈合情况及与伤口相关的并发症。

方法

计划进行一项前瞻性随机临床研究,将39例患者分为两组。两组均行开放LIS手术。第1组(n = 22)患者的切口用3-0铬制肠线间断缝合2针关闭,第2组(n = 17)患者的切口敞开。对患者进行术后90天的随访。

结果

第1组患者发生1例(4.5%)血肿、7例(31.8%)瘀斑和1例(4.5%)伤口感染。该组未见明显的外出血。伤口愈合时间为15.05±5.60天。第2组未发生血肿(P = 0.98),但出现2例(11.7%)瘀斑(P = 0.25)、4例(23.5%)伤口感染(P = 0.

相似文献

1
A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of primary wound closure after lateral internal sphincterotomy.内括约肌侧切术后一期伤口闭合的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Am J Surg. 2004 Feb;187(2):291-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.011.
2
Evaluation of healing and complications after lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: marginal suture of incision vs. open left incision: prospective, randomized, controlled study.慢性肛裂外侧内括约肌切开术后愈合情况及并发症的评估:切口边缘缝合与开放左侧切口对比:前瞻性、随机、对照研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Mar;51(3):329-33. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9122-2. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
3
Comparison of botulinum toxin injection and lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure.肉毒杆菌毒素注射与内括约肌侧切术治疗慢性肛裂的比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Feb;46(2):232-7. doi: 10.1097/01.DCR.0000044712.58674.09.
4
Open versus closed lateral sphincterotomy performed as an outpatient procedure under local anesthesia for chronic anal fissure: prospective randomized study of clinical and manometric longterm results.门诊局部麻醉下开放性与闭合性外侧括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂:临床及测压长期结果的前瞻性随机研究
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Sep;199(3):361-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.04.016.
5
Comparison of controlled-intermittent anal dilatation and lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: a prospective, randomized study.控制性间歇性肛门扩张术与侧方内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究
Int J Surg. 2009 Jun;7(3):228-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.03.006. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
6
Open vs. closed lateral internal sphincterotomy for idiopathic fissure-in-ano: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.开放性与闭合性侧方内括约肌切开术治疗特发性肛裂:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jun;47(6):847-52. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0530-2. Epub 2004 May 6.
7
A prospective randomized trial betwen subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy with radiofrequency bistoury and conventional parks' operation in the treatment of anal fissures.一项关于射频手术刀皮下外侧内括约肌切开术与传统 Parks 手术治疗肛裂的前瞻性随机试验。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2005 May-Jun;9(3):175-8.
8
Topical nitroglycerin versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: prospective, randomized trial.局部应用硝酸甘油与内括约肌侧切术治疗慢性肛裂的前瞻性随机试验
ANZ J Surg. 2005 Dec;75(12):1032-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03493.x.
9
Closed lateral internal sphincterotomy using endoshere cut scissors.使用内镜切割剪刀进行闭合性侧方内括约肌切开术。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Sep;89 Suppl 3:S104-7.
10
Randomized clinical trial comparing oral nifedipine with lateral anal sphincterotomy and tailored sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.比较口服硝苯地平与肛门外括约肌切开术及个体化括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2005 Apr;92(4):403-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4882.

引用本文的文献

1
Anal fissure.肛裂
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011 Mar;24(1):22-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1272820.
2
Operative procedures for fissure in ano.肛瘘手术操作
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD002199. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002199.pub4.
3
Type of lateral internal sphincterotomy incision: parallel or vertical?外侧内括约肌切开术切口类型:平行还是垂直?
World J Surg. 2011 May;35(5):1137-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1044-4.
4
Conservative and surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure: prospective longer term results.慢性肛裂的保守治疗和手术治疗:前瞻性长期结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 May;14(5):773-80. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1154-6. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
5
Idiopathic hypertensive anal canal: a place of internal sphincterotomy.特发性高血压性肛管:内括约肌切开术的部位。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Sep;13(9):1607-13. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0931-6. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
6
Medical and surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure: a prospective study.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov;11(11):1541-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0255-3. Epub 2007 Aug 31.