• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人群中心肌梗死后射血分数的测量。

Measurement of ejection fraction after myocardial infarction in the population.

作者信息

Lopez-Jimenez Francisco, Goraya Tauqir Y, Hellermann Jens P, Jacobsen Steven J, Reeder Guy S, Weston Susan A, Roger Véronique L

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 2004 Feb;125(2):397-403. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.2.397.

DOI:10.1378/chest.125.2.397
PMID:14769715
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the secular trends in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment after myocardial infarction (MI) and to identify the determinants of testing.

DESIGN

A population-based MI incidence cohort.

METHODS

The use of tests measuring LVEF (echocardiography, radionuclide, and left ventricular [LV] angiography) was examined among all consecutive residents of Olmsted County, MN, hospitalized for a validated incident MI between 1979 and 1998. Baseline characteristics and outcome were ascertained from community medical records.

RESULTS

Among 2,317 patients with incident MI, LVEF assessment increased from 1979 to 1986 (22 to 85%; p value for trend = 0.0001) to stabilize thereafter until 1998. During the most recent decade, LVEF was measured during the hospital stay in 81% of the patients. Characteristics associated with lesser use of tests included older age and measurement of ejection fraction within 1 year prior to the index MI. Larger MI size, prolonged hospital stay, and involvement of a cardiologist as a care provider were positively associated with determination of LVEF.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of LVEF after MI increased in the last 2 decades, but there continues to be a group of patients in whom it is not done. Given the potential benefits of LVEF measurement, including knowledge for risk stratification and therapeutic choices as underscored in recent practice guidelines, there may be additional opportunities for improving outcomes by ensuring its more consistent use. However, as testing for LVEF differs according to patient characteristics, reliance on selected clinically performed LVEF measurements will result in biased estimates of the prevalence of LV dysfunction after MI.

摘要

目的

评估心肌梗死(MI)后左心室射血分数(LVEF)评估的长期趋势,并确定检测的决定因素。

设计

基于人群的MI发病率队列研究。

方法

在明尼苏达州奥尔姆斯特德县所有因确诊的首次MI住院的连续居民中,检查了测量LVEF的检测方法(超声心动图、放射性核素和左心室[LV]血管造影)的使用情况。从社区医疗记录中确定基线特征和结局。

结果

在2317例首次发生MI的患者中,LVEF评估从1979年至1986年有所增加(从22%增至85%;趋势p值=0.0001),此后直至1998年保持稳定。在最近十年中,81%的患者在住院期间进行了LVEF测量。与检测使用较少相关的特征包括年龄较大以及在本次MI之前1年内测量射血分数。MI面积较大、住院时间延长以及有心脏病专家作为护理提供者与LVEF的测定呈正相关。

结论

在过去20年中,MI后LVEF的测量有所增加,但仍有一组患者未进行此项测量。鉴于LVEF测量的潜在益处,包括近期实践指南中强调的用于风险分层和治疗选择的信息,通过确保更一致地使用LVEF测量可能有更多改善结局的机会。然而,由于LVEF检测因患者特征而异,依赖部分临床进行的LVEF测量将导致MI后LV功能障碍患病率的估计存在偏差。

相似文献

1
Measurement of ejection fraction after myocardial infarction in the population.人群中心肌梗死后射血分数的测量。
Chest. 2004 Feb;125(2):397-403. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.2.397.
2
Left ventricular ejection fraction reassessment post-myocardial infarction: Current clinical practice and determinants of adverse remodeling.心肌梗死后左心室射血分数再评估:当前的临床实践和不良重构的决定因素。
Am Heart J. 2018 Apr;198:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
3
Predicting irreversible left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction.预测急性心肌梗死后不可逆的左心室功能障碍。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 May 1;103(9):1206-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.028.
4
Exercise training without ventricular remodeling in patients with moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction early after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后早期中度至重度左心室功能不全患者的运动训练与心室重构无关。
Int J Cardiol. 2003 Feb;87(2-3):237-44. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00251-6.
5
Comparison of regional versus global assessment of left ventricular function in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both after myocardial infarction: the valsartan in acute myocardial infarction echocardiographic study.心肌梗死后左心室功能不全、心力衰竭或两者兼具患者左心室功能的局部评估与整体评估比较:缬沙坦急性心肌梗死超声心动图研究
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006 Dec;19(12):1462-5. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.05.028.
6
Determinants of Diastolic Dysfunction Following Myocardial Infarction: Evidence for Causation Beyond Infarct Size.心肌梗死后舒张功能障碍的决定因素:梗死面积以外的因果证据。
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Dec;29(12):1815-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.04.016. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
7
Different prognostic factors according to left ventricular systolic function in patients with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者中根据左心室收缩功能划分的不同预后因素。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 15;221:90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.100. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
8
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者的左心室收缩功能障碍
Chest. 2002 Oct;122(4):1133-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.4.1133.
9
Implantable cardiac monitors in high-risk post-infarction patients with cardiac autonomic dysfunction and moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: Design and rationale of the SMART-MI trial.植入式心脏监测器用于心肌梗死后高危患者伴心脏自主神经功能障碍及左心室射血分数中度降低:SMART-MI试验的设计与原理
Am Heart J. 2017 Aug;190:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 19.
10
[Prognostic value of symptoms and signs of advanced heart failure and low left ventricle ejection fraction in patients after myocardial infarction with chronic heart failure].[晚期心力衰竭症状体征及左心室射血分数降低对心肌梗死后慢性心力衰竭患者的预后价值]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2006 Mar;20(117):285-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of admission serum calcium level with left ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠脉综合征患者入院时血清钙水平与左心室功能障碍的关联
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 29;9:1018048. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1018048. eCollection 2022.
2
Cardiovascular risk factors profile in patients with acute coronary syndrome with particular reference to left ventricular ejection fraction.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的心血管危险因素概况,特别提及左心室射血分数。
Indian Heart J. 2018 Jan-Feb;70(1):45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 May 31.
3
In-hospital measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction and one-year outcomes in acute coronary syndromes: results from the IMMEDIATE Trial.
急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院期间左心室射血分数测量及一年预后:即时试验结果
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2016 Aug 3;14(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12947-016-0068-1.
4
Long-term prognostic value of mitral regurgitation in acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者二尖瓣反流的长期预后价值。
Heart. 2010 Nov;96(22):1803-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.203059. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
5
Limitations in the current screening practice of assessing left ventricular ejection fraction for a primary prophylactic implantable defibrillator in southern Ontario.安大略省南部现行初级预防性植入式除颤器左心室射血分数筛查实践中的局限性。
Can J Cardiol. 2010 Mar;26(3):e118-24. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(10)70358-5.
6
Trends in the use of echocardiography and left ventriculography to assess left ventricular ejection fraction in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死住院患者中使用超声心动图和左心室造影评估左心室射血分数的趋势。
Am Heart J. 2009 Aug;158(2):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.05.027.
7
Left ventricular function and heart failure in myocardial infarction: impact of the new definition in the community.心肌梗死中的左心室功能与心力衰竭:新定义在社区中的影响
Am Heart J. 2008 Nov;156(5):810-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.06.040. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
8
Long-term trends in the incidence of heart failure after myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后心力衰竭发病率的长期趋势。
Circulation. 2008 Nov 11;118(20):2057-62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.784215. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
9
Stenting of unprotected left main stem stenosis: Results from a German single-centre registry.无保护左主干狭窄的支架置入术:来自德国单中心注册研究的结果。
Exp Clin Cardiol. 2008 Spring;13(1):37-41.
10
Changing trends in the evaluation of ejection fraction in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: the Worcester Heart Attack Study.急性心肌梗死住院患者射血分数评估的变化趋势:伍斯特心脏病发作研究
Am Heart J. 2008 Mar;155(3):485-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.044.