Stuart Mary, Weinrich Michael
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Health Administration and Policy Program, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.
Chest. 2004 Feb;125(2):695-703. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.2.695.
Rated number one in overall health system performance by the World Health Organization, the French spend less than half the amount on annual health care per capita that the United States spends. One contributing factor may be the attention given to chronic care. Since the mid-1900s, the French have developed regional community-based specialty systems for patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency or failure. COPD is the major cause of respiratory failure, the fourth leading cause of death in the United States, and its prevalence is increasing. Despite the clinical success of home mechanical ventilation and the potential for cost savings, providing such services in the United States remains a challenge. Lessons from France can inform the development of cost-effective chronic care models in the United States In this article, we review the French experience in the context of the United States Supreme Court's Olmstead decision, mandating that people in "more restrictive settings" such as nursing homes be offered community-based supports. We suggest that regional demonstration projects for patients with chronic respiratory failure or insufficiency can provide an important step in the development of effective chronic care systems in the United States
法国在整体医疗系统表现方面被世界卫生组织评为第一,其人均年度医疗保健支出不到美国的一半。一个促成因素可能是对慢性病护理的重视。自20世纪中叶以来,法国为慢性呼吸功能不全或衰竭患者建立了基于社区的区域专科系统。慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是呼吸衰竭的主要原因,在美国是第四大死因,且其患病率正在上升。尽管家庭机械通气在临床上取得了成功,且有可能节省成本,但在美国提供此类服务仍然是一项挑战。法国的经验可以为美国具有成本效益的慢性病护理模式的发展提供参考。在本文中,我们结合美国最高法院的奥姆斯特德裁决来审视法国的经验,该裁决要求为养老院等“限制更多的环境”中的人们提供基于社区的支持。我们建议,针对慢性呼吸衰竭或功能不全患者的区域示范项目可以为美国有效慢性病护理系统的发展迈出重要一步。