• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于淋巴结阳性(III期)直肠癌的新肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期策略:一项分析

New tumor-node-metastasis staging strategy for node-positive (stage III) rectal cancer: an analysis.

作者信息

Greene Frederick L, Stewart Andrew K, Norton H James

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC 28232-2861, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):1778-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.015. Epub 2004 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2004.07.015
PMID:14769855
Abstract

PURPOSE

The tumor-node-metastasis system for staging rectal cancer is based on invasion, number of involved nodes, and metastasis. Nodes are classified as N1 or N2 according to the number involved with metastases. Nodal positivity defines stage III regardless of depth of invasion or number of positive nodes. Our purpose was to analyze overall survival when node-positive patients were stratified into three new subsets.

METHODS

We analyzed data entered into the National Cancer Data Base for 5,987 stage III patients with rectal cancer between 1991 and 1993. Survival was calculated using three new subgroups (IIIA: T1/2, N1; IIIB: T3/4, N1; IIIC: any T, N2). Survival following surgery and adjuvant therapy was assessed. The observed survival rates were calculated and compared using the log-rank method. The Cox regression model assessed subgroup differences.

RESULTS

Five-year observed survival rates for stage III subcategories were 55.1% in IIIA; 35.3% in IIIB; and 24.5% in IIIC. Stratifying for treatment outcome, stage IIIA patients having surgery alone (n = 278) had poorer observed 5-year survival (39%) than patients treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy (chemo/XRT; n = 765; 60%). Similar outcomes occurred in IIIB (surgery-alone [n = 726; 21.7%] and chemo/XRT [n = 2,130; 40.9%] groups) and in IIIC (surgery-alone [n = 467; 12.2%] and chemo/XRT [n = 1,621; 28.9%] groups). Differences were significant (P <.0001) in all stages.

CONCLUSION

The traditional stage III designation of rectal cancer fails to account for invasion (T1-4) and number of involved nodes (N1, N2). The stratification of stage III patients into three subsets should be used in future analyses of rectal cancer. The effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy was beneficial in all subsets.

摘要

目的

直肠癌分期的肿瘤-淋巴结-转移系统基于肿瘤侵犯情况、受累淋巴结数量及有无转移。根据转移的淋巴结数量,将淋巴结分为N1或N2。无论肿瘤侵犯深度或阳性淋巴结数量多少,淋巴结阳性均定义为Ⅲ期。我们的目的是分析将淋巴结阳性患者分为三个新亚组时的总生存率。

方法

我们分析了1991年至1993年间录入国家癌症数据库的5987例Ⅲ期直肠癌患者的数据。使用三个新亚组(ⅢA期:T1/2,N1;ⅢB期:T3/4,N1;ⅡIC期:任何T,N2)计算生存率。评估手术及辅助治疗后的生存率。使用对数秩检验计算并比较观察到的生存率。Cox回归模型评估亚组差异。

结果

Ⅲ期各亚组的5年观察生存率分别为:ⅢA期55.1%;ⅢB期35.3%;ⅡIC期24.5%。按治疗结果分层,单纯手术的ⅢA期患者(n = 278)的5年观察生存率(39%)低于接受手术及辅助化疗或放疗(化疗/放疗;n = 765;60%)的患者。ⅢB期(单纯手术组[n = 726;21.7%]和化疗/放疗组[n = 2130;40.9%])和ⅡIC期(单纯手术组[n = 467;12.2%]和化疗/放疗组[n = 1621;28.9%])也出现了类似结果。各期差异均有统计学意义(P <.0001)。

结论

直肠癌传统的Ⅲ期分类未考虑肿瘤侵犯情况(T1-4)和受累淋巴结数量(N1、N2)。Ⅲ期患者分为三个亚组的分层方法应在未来直肠癌分析中使用。术后辅助治疗对所有亚组均有益。

相似文献

1
New tumor-node-metastasis staging strategy for node-positive (stage III) rectal cancer: an analysis.用于淋巴结阳性(III期)直肠癌的新肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期策略:一项分析
J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):1778-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.015. Epub 2004 Feb 9.
2
Impact of T and N stage and treatment on survival and relapse in adjuvant rectal cancer: a pooled analysis.T和N分期及治疗对辅助性直肠癌生存和复发的影响:一项汇总分析
J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):1785-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.173. Epub 2004 Apr 5.
3
Lymph-vascular space invasion and number of positive para-aortic node groups predict survival in node-positive patients with endometrial cancer.淋巴管间隙浸润和主动脉旁阳性淋巴结组数量可预测子宫内膜癌淋巴结阳性患者的生存率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Mar;96(3):651-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.11.026.
4
Survival impact of lymph node metastasis in TNM stage III carcinoma of the colon and rectum.TNM分期为III期的结直肠癌中淋巴结转移对生存的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jun;180(6):705-12.
5
lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in patients with stage III rectal cancer treated with total mesorectal excision followed by chemoradiotherapy.在接受全直肠系膜切除术后进行放化疗的Ⅲ期直肠癌患者中,淋巴结比率作为一种预后因素。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jul 1;74(3):796-802. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.065. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
6
Distribution of lymph node metastasis is a prognostic index in patients with stage III colon cancer.淋巴结转移分布是III期结肠癌患者的一个预后指标。
Surgery. 2006 Apr;139(4):516-22. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.09.004.
7
A new TNM staging strategy for node-positive (stage III) colon cancer: an analysis of 50,042 patients.一种针对淋巴结阳性(Ⅲ期)结肠癌的新TNM分期策略:对50042例患者的分析。
Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):416-21; discussion 421. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00003.
8
Lymph node ratio: role in the staging of node-positive colon cancer.淋巴结比率:在淋巴结阳性结肠癌分期中的作用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jun;15(6):1600-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9716-x. Epub 2008 Mar 8.
9
Can depth of tumour invasion predict lymph node positivity in patients undergoing resection for early rectal cancer? A comparative study between T1 and T2 cancers.肿瘤浸润深度能否预测早期直肠癌切除患者的淋巴结阳性情况?T1期和T2期癌症的比较研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Mar;10(3):231-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01411.x.
10
Appraisal of a revised lymph node classification system for esophageal squamous cell cancer.对食管癌鳞状细胞癌淋巴结分类系统修订版的评估。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Apr;83(4):1265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Controversies and Perspectives in the Current Management of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer-A Systematic Review.局部晚期直肠癌患者当前管理中的争议与展望——一项系统综述
Life (Basel). 2025 Jun 25;15(7):1011. doi: 10.3390/life15071011.
2
Comparison of three classifications for lymph node evaluation in patients undergoing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.直肠癌全直肠系膜切除患者淋巴结评估三种分类方法的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Jun;403(4):451-462. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1662-5. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
3
The survival and clinicopathological differences between patients with stage IIIA and stage II rectal cancer: An analysis of 12,036 patients in the SEER database.
ⅢA期和Ⅱ期直肠癌患者的生存情况及临床病理差异:对监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据库中12036例患者的分析
Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 29;7(48):79787-79796. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12970.
4
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for clinically diagnosed T3N0 rectal cancer.临床诊断为T3N0期直肠癌的术前放化疗
Surg Today. 2016 Jan;46(1):90-96. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1136-0. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
5
Prognostic impact of the metastatic lymph node ratio on survival in rectal cancer.转移性淋巴结比率对直肠癌生存的预后影响。
Ann Coloproctol. 2013 Jun;29(3):100-5. doi: 10.3393/ac.2013.29.3.100. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
6
MicroRNA expression profile associated with response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer patients.与局部晚期直肠癌患者新辅助放化疗反应相关的 microRNA 表达谱。
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Nov 20;7:195. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-195.
7
Factors predicting worse prognosis in patients affected by pT3 N0 colon cancer: long-term results of a monocentric series of 137 radically resected patients in a 5-year period.预测 pT3N0 结肠癌患者预后较差的因素:5 年内单中心 137 例根治性切除患者的长期结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Feb;28(2):207-15. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1563-y. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
8
Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer.III期直肠癌中淋巴结比率的预后意义
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011 Oct;27(5):252-9. doi: 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.252. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
9
Effects of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy on recurrence and survival in stage III rectal cancer.术后辅助放疗对 III 期直肠癌复发和生存的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Jun;15(6):963-70. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1497-7. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
10
Impact of the new AJCC staging system and adjuvant treatment in rectal cancer.新 AJCC 分期系统和辅助治疗对直肠癌的影响。
Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Apr;36(2):121-7. doi: 10.4143/crt.2004.36.2.121. Epub 2004 Apr 30.