Suppr超能文献

通过比较静脉与涤纶股腘动脉旁路移植术来评估新型动脉假体的标准。

Criteria for evaluation of new arterial prostheses by comparing vein with dacron femoropopliteal bypasses.

作者信息

Reichle F A

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978 May;146(5):714-20.

PMID:148109
Abstract

Significant initial and long term salvage can be achieved with popliteal arterial bypasses using either autogenous saphenous vein or woven Dacron. Long term experience with these materials show that they should serve as standards for the comparison of newer materials. Autogenous vein femoropopliteal bypasses result in higher average initial and long term graft function than do Dacron femoropopliteal grafts. However, depending upon the anatomic area, the superiority of vein grafts is not always apparent. Arterial prosthetic materials must be carefully evaluated in regard to initial and long term function. Before general use of recently developed arterial substitutes is recommended, their function must be shown to be superior to that of well known arterial prostheses.

摘要

使用自体大隐静脉或编织涤纶进行腘动脉旁路移植术可实现显著的初始和长期挽救效果。长期使用这些材料的经验表明,它们应作为比较新型材料的标准。自体静脉股腘动脉旁路移植术的平均初始和长期移植物功能高于涤纶股腘动脉移植物。然而,根据解剖区域的不同,静脉移植物的优势并不总是明显的。必须对动脉假体材料的初始和长期功能进行仔细评估。在建议广泛使用最近开发的动脉替代物之前,必须证明它们的功能优于知名的动脉假体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验