Clinical practice guidelines.
作者信息
Carter A
出版信息
CMAJ. 1992 Dec 1;147(11):1649-50.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Clinical practice guidelines.临床实践指南
CMAJ. 1992 Dec 1;147(11):1649-50.
2
3
Making decisions about cancer screening when the guidelines are unclear or conflicting.在指南不明确或相互冲突时做出癌症筛查决策。
J Fam Pract. 2001 Aug;50(8):682-7.
4
Evaluating the quality of clinical guidelines. Linking decisions to medical evidence.评估临床指南的质量。将决策与医学证据相联系。
Oncology (Williston Park). 1998 Nov;12(11A):310-4.
5
Using evidence in pain practice: Part II: Interpreting and applying systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.疼痛诊疗中的证据运用：第二部分：解读与应用系统评价及临床实践指南
Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):531-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00422_2.x.
6
[Why not standard practice guidelines in Japan?].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1999 Apr;26(5):597-601.
7
Evidence-based care: 2. Setting guidelines: how should we manage this problem?循证护理：2. 制定指南：我们应如何处理这个问题？
CMAJ. 1994 May 1;150(9):1417-23.
8
Agreement on cardiotocogram interpretation and clinical decision using the STAN guidelines.关于使用STAN指南进行胎心监护图解读及临床决策的共识
BJOG. 2009 Oct;116(11):1540-1; author reply 1541-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02302.x.
9
Clinical guidelines and performance measures.临床指南与绩效指标。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan;16(1):16-7.
10
Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making.相互冲突的规范：加拿大乡村家庭医生对临床实践指南和共同决策的看法。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Apr;13(2):79-84. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007052.
引用本文的文献
1
The value of analyzing textbook outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy-a narrative review.腹腔镜肝切除术后分析教科书结果的价值——一项叙述性综述
Transl Cancer Res. 2023 Mar 31;12(3):631-637. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-2122. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
2
Rigorous method to assess quality and generalizability of clinical practice guidelines.评估临床实践指南质量和可推广性的严谨方法。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2014 Sep;67(5):397-8. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v67i5.1397.
3
Should clinical practitioners, as part of institutional or accreditation standards, be required to document their rationale when choosing to not adhere to widely accepted clinical practice guidelines?作为机构或认证标准的一部分，临床从业者在选择不遵循广泛接受的临床实践指南时，是否应该被要求记录其理由？
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2013 Jul;66(4):253-5. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v66i4.1272.
4
Clinical guidelines: acceptance and promotion.临床指南：接受与推广
Qual Health Care. 1993 Dec;2(4):213-4. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.4.213.
本文引用的文献
1
Two cheers for meta-analysis: problems and opportunities in aggregating results of clinical trials.为荟萃分析喝彩两声：汇总临床试验结果中的问题与机遇
CMAJ. 1988 May 15;138(10):891-5.
Zotero 插件