The choice of contrast media: medical, ethical and legal considerations.
作者信息
Roy D J, Dickens B M, McGregor M
出版信息
CMAJ. 1992 Nov 1;147(9):1321-4.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The choice of contrast media: medical, ethical and legal considerations.造影剂的选择：医学、伦理及法律考量
CMAJ. 1992 Nov 1;147(9):1321-4.
2
Ethical issues in the Canadian health care system.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1998 Nov 27;110(22):779-82.
3
Choice of contrast media.造影剂的选择。
CMAJ. 1993 Apr 1;148(7):1107.
4
5
Can we afford it?: ethical consideration of expensive drug treatment for neonates and infants.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Dec;86(6):587-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.211.
6
[Economic treatment waiver and patient selection as a legal problem].[经济治疗豁免与患者选择作为一个法律问题]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1993 Jul 12;87(7):559-66.
7
Is there a role for physicians in health and medical resource allocation?医生在健康和医疗资源分配中是否能发挥作用？
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1994 Feb;27(1):12-4.
8
Ethical considerations in podiatric care of the older patient.老年患者足病护理中的伦理考量
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1993 Jan;10(1):35-46.
9
Voluntary steriolization: legal and ethical aspects.自愿绝育：法律与伦理层面
Leg Med Q. 1979;3(1):13-23.
10
[Medical ethics and economics in the era of insufficient resources].资源匮乏时代的医学伦理与经济学
Harefuah. 2009 Mar;148(3):144-8, 212.
本文引用的文献
1
2
The risks of death and of severe nonfatal reactions with high- vs low-osmolality contrast media: a meta-analysis.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Apr;156(4):825-32. doi: 10.2214/ajr.156.4.1825900.
3
Low-osmolality contrast agents--who needs them?低渗造影剂——谁需要它们？
N Engl J Med. 1992 Feb 13;326(7):482-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202133260709.
4
Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
N Engl J Med. 1992 Feb 13;326(7):425-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202133260701.
5
Equality and rights in medical care.医疗保健中的平等与权利。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1976 Feb;6(1):29-34.
Zotero 插件