Barraquer J
Instituto Barraquer, Barcelona, Spain.
Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;81(3):267-80. doi: 10.1007/BF00161764.
The author refers his personal experience with different types of IOL since 1950. After an initial period of enthusiasm (1950 to 1961) the author abandoned the techniques of Ridley, Strampelli and Dannheim, because of the considerable incidence of severe complications directly related to the IOL. Over many years he emphasized the serious postoperative complications which appeared in the course of the years, even with the different new types of IOL which acquired a certain prestige. With the new posterior chamber lenses placed in the capsular bag, the results became more encouraging and the author resumed IOL implantation with this type of lenses after an adequate period of observation and experimentation. The present criteria, technique and results of the author are discussed together with some considerations on future research work to develop new techniques for substitution of the opacified lens and also to attempt to restore accommodation.
作者讲述了自1950年以来其在不同类型人工晶状体方面的个人经历。在经历了最初的热情期（1950年至1961年）后，作者放弃了里德利、斯特兰佩利和丹海姆的技术，因为与人工晶状体直接相关的严重并发症发生率相当高。多年来，他强调了这些年来出现的严重术后并发症，即使是那些获得了一定声誉的不同新型人工晶状体也不例外。随着新型后房型人工晶状体植入囊袋内，结果变得更令人鼓舞，在经过充分的观察和试验期后，作者恢复了使用这种类型人工晶状体进行植入手术。本文讨论了作者目前的标准、技术和结果，同时对未来研究工作进行了一些思考，这些研究旨在开发用于替代混浊晶状体的新技术，并尝试恢复调节功能。
